<em>The Declaration of Independence establishes the values of the United States of America. It says that "all men are created equal" and have the right to "life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness." Further, it states the purpose of government is to protect these values.</em>
Elaboration/Explanation:
One big source for Jefferson was John Locke. Locke’s Second Treatise of Government built upon mutual respect for property rights. All free men own property and therefore deserve some rights. The more property, the more rights. Locke like Jefferson believed that kings only earned respect for their rights when they respected the rights and privileges of their subjects.
Jefferson, of course, took this further. He, Franklin, and some other founding fathers essentially ran in radical English circles. Therefore some rights were so important that they do not accrue according to property ownership. Hence, all men were created equal in some respects; even though major property holders were more equal. All men deserved the rights to life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness. Of course, Jefferson understood that large landholders exercised the rights of gentry to guide their poorer neighbors.
I believe it’s patriots— because patriots are very obsessed with their country, and expressive. They probably wanted what’s best and wanted to draft a better constitution
Answer:
While the new helmets <em>decrease </em>the probability of a concussion resulting from each individual collision, at the same time the new helmets could also give football players an incentive to play more <em>recklessly</em>, which could potentially <em>increase </em>the amount of violent collisions and thus the number of concussions suffered by NFL players, all else equal.
Explanation:
The <u>human factor </u>is an important matter to consider in matters like these.
Technical solutions, like the introduction of new helmets, may improve the situation when it comes to equipment, but it is the fact that players know that new helmets are stronger and thus they are more protected, would result in a new reckless <em>behavior</em>.
With the introduction of new helmets, players would become less motivated to play carefully, because they would know that the new helmets allow them to do so. The curious question would be to ask is this one. If players do not know that their helmets are safer, would they play more recklessly or not?
