Answer:
The main idea that the author Caitlin Kenney seems to address in this essay seems to be that even though money has no direct relationship with the level of happiness of a person, it has some influence, to a certain extent, of making the person believe that her life is much better than that of the ones poorer than her.
Explanation:
In the study of how incomes have any impact on the overall happiness of a person, Caitlin Kenney's "High Incomes Don't Bring You Happiness" delves into what it is that makes money an important factor of our lives and do they have any connection with how people feel about their lives.
Starting the essay with the question<em> "How much do you think it would take to make you happy?</em>" the author implores into the issue of how high-income groups seem to be relatively happier than the ones in the lower-income groups. Referencing to the study by psychologist Daniel Kahneman and economist Angus Deaton, the study further reveals how certain amounts of income seem to have a lighter effect on people. But overall, even though money has no direct connection with how happy a person is, there is still some effect it has, like influencing people to believe that the life they live is much better than the ones lived by the poorer people.
Answer:
Other people might want what you have
Explanation:
Jeff wanted a father like Mr. Matthews while Wyatt wanted a father like Jeffs
Answer:
Based on word choice, Giblin feels:
B. that it was worthwhile.
Explanation:
We can easily eliminate options A and C, since there is nothing conveying a negative connotation in the excerpt. We are left with options B and D.
Let's take a look at option D first. It says Giblin thinks the process of obtaining copies of the stone was amazing. However, that is not what the word choice conveys. Had there been words such as "fantastic" or "incredible" in the excerpt, this option would have made sense. But that is not the case.
<u>Option B is the only correct one. The excerpt uses words such as "fortunately", "good", and "clear". Those words convey the idea that the process the French used was worthwhile. It not only worked, but worked well, effectively.</u>
Answer: hi! I'll help the best I can
Good ways
Life would be boring
We couldn't cure diseases
It would make it harder to transport
People could pass away more often
We wouldn't be able to communicate in long distances
Good ways
less car accidents would happen
less self murders would happen because of cyber bullying
we could all spend more time together
anxiety would go down from less use of social media
our eyes would improve.
The earth wouldn't be poluted
Explanation:
So in conclusion there is a huge controversy about this and it would be very hard actually pinpoint if technology would be good.
