The correct answer to this open question is the following.
Unfortunately, you forgot to attach the article or the text. You also forgot to include the name of the author or the title of the article.
Without the text, we do not know what is its content. Just you know.
However, trying to offer some help, we can comment on the following.
Recently, authors have divided their opinions about the advantages or disadvantages of paying college student-athletes.
The ones who are in favor of paying athletes argue that schools receive a lot of money due to TV agreements, ticket sales, merchandising, and concessions. That is why they deserve a "slice of the pie."
On the other hand, the authors that disagree and still consider that college athletes are amateurs, support their arguments saying that they are students, and the way they are receiving compensation is through their scholarships. And these authors say that schools invest a lot of money not only in academics but in facilities and equipment to have their athletes ready to compete and win.
Answer:
The correct answer is free of vague language.
Explanation:
The language we want to teach is called vague, because of how little specific it is. This makes people who are looking for meaning to those words. Once this clarification is made, the second is to break old structures that lie in our mind: The phrases do not have to be complete, the words do not have to have the same meaning for everyone.
Lazy language is another way of speaking. It has the peculiarity that avoids or dodges people's resistance. However it has limits. I have always said it: It cannot go against the values of a person.
The answer is a the first sentence is dialogue and the second sentence shows action
The answer is character vs character.
Answer:
which questions please...I want to help you
