Answer:
False
Explanation:
The statement that says that in the context of project management, a task duration is always the same as the amount of work (effort) it takes to finish the task is false because the effort is the time a person needs to finish a task while the duration is the period of time that a person has to finish it. For example, an employee has a task that takes forty hours of work to finish it but he has a month to do it. In this case, the effort is forty hours but the task duration is one month.
<span>The opportunity cost of reading is watching TV.
</span>
Opportunity cost alludes to an advantage that a person could have gotten, yet offered up, to make another course of move. Expressed in an unexpected way, an opportunity cost that shows an alternative given up when a choice is made. This cost is, accordingly, most significant for two totally unrelated occasions.
Answer:
A and B
Explanation:
A) income statement
insurance expense-understand net income-overstated
B) balance sheet
prepaid insurance -overstated stockholders equity -overstated
Answer:
1. After the split, how many shares of common stock are outstanding and what is their par value per share?
40,000 stocks outstanding x 2 = 80,000 stocks outstanding after the stock split
par value of each stock = $2 / 2 = $1
Aren't both questions the same?
2. After the split, the number of shares outstanding is <u>80,000</u> and the par value per share is <u>$1</u>.
Explanation:
When a stock split happens, the total number of outstanding stock is just multiplied by the stock split factor, in this case it was 2, but other times it might be 4 or 7 (like Apple stock). You just multiply total outstanding stock by the split number. On the other hand, par value is calculated by dividing the current par value by the split number.
Answer:
Part 1. B Reject
Part 2. Division H's project should be rejected, because its return is less than the risk-based cost of capital for the division.
Explanation:
Division H's project should be rejected, because its return is less than the risk-based cost of capital for the division.
