The answer is B. The 2nd one
We can actually deduce the following from the given questions.
- Mr. Ampil's company isn't at fault since Dr. Petrovski didn't avail himself to the authorised official tour operators for sightseeing.
- The congress organizers are actually responsible for the planning and organization of the event and also to ensure that foreign delegates have a memorable experience.
- I don't think Dr. Petrovski can actually demand payment from the conference organizers because he was at fault.
- Such incidence can be prevented by the congress organizers by ensuring that every participant is checked before tour begins.
- One of the safeguards the organizers can put in place is to state their terms and conditions clearly to all participants.
<h3>Who is a conference participant?</h3>
A conference participant is actually known to be someone or an individual who attends scheduled conference which is either self-sponsored or sponsored by the organisation related to the participant.
We see that the above questions have been given the various answers.
Learn more about business conference on brainly.com/question/27206976
#SPJ1
Answer:
C
Explanation:
analogy I learned this to
