Answer: A target price for farm crops is an example of price floor because it’s fixed ahead of harvests with the interest of farmers in mind.
Explanation: A quick definition of both concepts would be of help. A price floor is usually fixed by government legislation and it ensures that the price of a commodity or service does not fall below a certain minimum. In the case of farm crops, a floor price makes sure that the farmers are guaranteed a level of profit in case there is poor harvest for any reason whatsoever. The price floor must be fixed above the equilibrium price for this to be effective.
A target price is an expectation of the future price of commodities or services, and hence prices are fixed ahead of the harvest in the case of farm crops. This is so because as explained earlier, future conditions might change and become unfavorable, therefore making the current market price unprofitable for farmers. If for example, a sack of potatoes currently sells for $30, the government may fix the price floor ahead of the harvest season at $45 per sack. This implies that after harvesting farmers can still sell at $30. However if the harvest turns out to be bad perhaps due to natural disasters, pests or fungal attacks, etc, then the farmers can go ahead and sell at $45 and possibly higher. No farmer is allowed to sell below $45 (since that is the ‘floor’). That way, farmers would still have some profit guaranteed and would be encouraged to remain in the farming business.
Answer:
Total direct material variance= $1,000 favorable
Explanation:
Giving the following information:
Company had a favorable direct materials price variance of $3,000 and an unfavorable direct materials usage variance of $2,000.
<u>To calculate the total direct material variance, we need to use the following formula:</u>
<u></u>
Total direct material variance= price variance +/- quantity variance
Total direct material variance= 3,000 - 2,000
Total direct material variance= $1,000 favorable
if a company is operating at the full production capacity, then to fulfill more demand, the company will have to invest more in the production line.
Option A and C
In quasi-contract cases, the defendant received a benefit from the plaintiff. In promissory estoppel cases, the defendant made a promise that the plaintiff relied on.
<h3><u>
Explanation:</u></h3>
A quasi-contract is a retroactive system among two parties who own no prior commitments to one another. It is designed by an expert to change a situation in which one individual takes something at the value of the other. The plaintiff must have provided a substantial thing or service to the added party with the expectation or assumption that mortgage would be supplied.
Promissory estoppel is a concept in contract law that hinders a character from performing reverse on a commitment even if a legitimate contract does not endure.
Answer: B - Internal Analysis
Explanation: Internal Analysis involves a company looking inwards to determine it's competencies, strength, weakness and advantages. Internal anaylsis usually incorporates a SWOT analysis.
A SWOT analysis is the analysis of the strength, weakness, opportunities and threats of the organisation.
An external analysis involves analysing the market place and economy to identify trends and put measures in place to take advantage of current trends to ensure profit maximization.
Competitior anaylsis involves analysising the competitions of an organisation to identify threats and opportunities so as to maximaise profit
Client advantage can arise from building a loyal customer base that always patronise the business or having a company been one of the few producers of a product.
In the case of Gems Corps, they looked inwards and made improvements to how the company is run.
Therefore,Gems Corps made use of Internal Analysis.
I hope my answer helps.
Goodluck
