Answer:
mutation in the dna of a gene
Explanation:
i got it right on my quiz
All of these are necessary
A team of scientists has consistently gotten the same unexpected results from a set of experiments. Then "Peer review of the scientific methods and data analysis" may helps the scientists to ensure the reliability of the results.
<u>Answer:</u> Option D
<u>Explanation:</u>
The roots of achieving unexpected results lie or depend on scientific methods used and analysis of data performed for acquiring results. Therefore when experiment results into unexpected readings researcher need to give a review of entire method and analysis.
Although rest other points like publication of results, discussing with friends and family members or removal of inconsistent data may or may not help depends upon conditions but reviewing helps as observed in many cases , because one must have performed unintentionally or intentionally an error while going through methods.
your answer should be “interspecific competition”
MARK ME BRAINLIEST PLEASE!!!!
If dominant allele = p, and recessive allele = q,
and p+q = 1, then:

So if 75% have the p, then p^2 = homozygous dominant

And if the other 25% have the q, the q^2 = homozygous recessive

Now those remaining MUST be the heterozygous, thus 2pq are those:
2pq = 2(.75)(.25) = .375
Therefore homozygous dominant are 56.3% and heterozygous are 37.5%