Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
<u>Expand the expression with the help of distributive property.</u>
- 2(q + 3)
- => (2 x q) + (2 x 3)
- => 2q + 6
Hence, the expanded expression is 2q + 6.
Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:
{2 + 2w = l
{94 = 2w + 2l
94 = 2w + 2[2 + 2w]
94 = 2w + 4 + 4w
94 = 4 + 6w
- 4 - 4
_________

[Plug this back into both equations above to get the length of 32 feet]; 
I am joyous to assist you anytime.
Step-by-step explanation:
c >= 2
that means any value of c greater or equal to 2 is a valid solution. so, yes, 2 is a solution for this.
c < 2
that means any value of c smaller than 2 is a valid solution. so, no, 2 is not smaller than 2, so it is not a solution.
c < 3
that means any value of c smaller than 3 is a valid solution. so, yes, 2 is smaller than 3, so 2 is a solution.
3 < c
that means any value of c, for that 3 is smaller, is a valid solution. our in other words, any value for c larger than 3 is a valid solution. so, no, 2 is not larger than 3, so it is not a solution.
-8 < c
that means any value of c, for that -8 is smaller, is a valid solution. our in other words, any value for c larger than -8 is a valid solution. so, yes, 2 is larger than -8, so it is a solution.

now, by traditional method, as "x" progresses towards the positive infinitity, it becomes 100, 10000, 10000000, 1000000000 and so on, and notice, the limit of the numerator becomes large.
BUT, notice the denominator, for the same values of "x", the denominator becomes larg"er" than the numerator on every iteration, ever becoming larger and larger, and yielding a fraction whose denominator is larger than the numerator.
as the denominator increases faster, since as the lingo goes, "reaches the limit faster than the numerator", the fraction becomes ever smaller an smaller ever going towards 0.
now, we could just use L'Hopital rule to check on that.

notice those derivatives atop and bottom, the top is static, whilst the bottom is racing away to infinity, ever going towards 0.