If any answer possible, I would put it's top! :)
Answer:
present progressive
Explanation:
The present progressive is a verb construction (made up of a present form of the verb "to be" plus a present participle) that conveys a sense of ongoing action at the present time.
are is a present form of the verb "to be"
logging on is the present participle of the phrasal verb log on
Answer:
I have no idea. Can you show us a picture of that paragraph?
Answer:
Statement that best explains the difference in viewpoint in the Greenberg interview from that in the informational text on Thurgood Marshall is Option D: The Greenberg interview provides an insider's view of the Brown vs. Board of Education case; the perspective of the informational article is more distant.
Explanation:
Brown v. Board of Education case was a decision which set benchmark in Supreme Court of U.S. It ruled that the state laws which establish racial discrimination in public schools are unconstitutional.
Thurgood Marshall was an American lawyer in the Supreme Court of the United States. Other given option are incorrect. Greenberg gave personal knowledge of Thurgood Marshall and about the case but the informational article was only based on research.
Greenberg interview gave important details while article was based only on research.
<em>This is like a story plus a claim following your requests. Hope it helps you, though.</em>
<h3>We call the meeting to order
11:42 AM</h3>
This is the case-claim of the missing french fries. It happened last Sunday, when I made a claim that I witnessed frozen french fries being stolen by a group of people at a store. The store retrieved the fries on Wednesday <em>today</em>. Thankfully, they were not damaged. Still in good condition, still edible. "What evidence is there"? Good question, I saw it at the store and recorded it. I presented the recording, and all is well that ends well!
<em>This claim is not based on an actual case. This is fictional, and any relation to an actual person is purely coincedential.</em>
