1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
vova2212 [387]
3 years ago
7

2. Historians cannot learn about people from the past if they do not have written records. O True O False.​

History
1 answer:
iren [92.7K]3 years ago
8 0

Answer:

False

Explanation:

Historians can learn about people from the past if they do not have written records. This is because in the prehistoric era there was no form of writing or records kept and historians still learnt about the period.

This was however possible through the use of remains and different types of artifacts found in the area which gave rise to the historians studying and inferring certain conclusions.

You might be interested in
Por q las personas migran del campo a la ciudad
inn [45]

Answer:

Three of the top reasons are because of jobs, education and lifestyle

Explanation:

8 0
2 years ago
Select that all apply: Functions of state committees include which of the following
liq [111]
Organizing and managing campaigns for state offices<span>
assisting in local campaigns
</span>
organizing state conventions<span>
raising money</span>
3 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What foreign policy problems did the u.s. faced after the end of the cold war?
scoray [572]
<span>It’s become ever clearer that the US is the sole superpower. In the early 90s one could still talk of a Russo-American partnership, but that has become unrealistic, except in a very limited sense, as Russia continued to decline in the 1990s. The rising powers are not in a position to challenge the United States.</span>
4 0
2 years ago
Amos was a native of Judah, but God called him to minister in Israel.<br><br><br> True<br> False
Svetach [21]
False He was not a native of Judah but God did call him.
5 0
2 years ago
Why were slaves important to the Roman Empire​
Gelneren [198K]

Answer:

Explanation:

Slavery in ancient Rome played an important role in society and the economy. Besides manual labor, slaves performed many domestic services, and might be employed at highly skilled jobs and professions. ... Slaves were considered property under Roman law and had no legal personhood. Most slaves would never be freed.

4 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • One of president reagan’s main goal was to
    8·2 answers
  • Which TruForm measure could vote is used to approve an amendment to the state constitution
    7·1 answer
  • Who won the 40th Superbowl?
    14·2 answers
  • The emperors of Mali were known as Musas. Mansas. Malias. Menahs.
    7·2 answers
  • African Americans after the cold war
    13·1 answer
  • Which of the following led to a weakened Soviet government?
    13·1 answer
  • why did some asian nations become democratic while others were led by dictators or communist governments
    12·1 answer
  • (b) Megaliths are found in​
    15·2 answers
  • How did humanism impact science?
    7·1 answer
  • Goals of social policy
    5·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!