Far too frequently we engage in small talk without becoming involved in the conversation, since it only concerns unimportant matters, as stated in option D.
<h3>What is small talk?</h3>
Small talk is the kind of conversation we have when we do not know the other person well. It is often carried out in places such as the bus, the subway, a bank line, etc. Small talk concerns unimportant matters, such as:
- How crowded the place is.
We do not really become involved in the conversation when we carry out a small talk. The purpose is usually to pass the time or to simply avoid boredom or awkwardness. Most of the time, it is not our purpose to actually get to know that person well.
With the information above in mind, we can select option D as the correct answer.
The missing answer choices for this question are:
Learn more about small talk here:
brainly.com/question/2070691
#SPJ1
Answer: DIVERSITY is the perceived differents among people: age, functional specialty, profession, geographic origin, lifestyle, tenure with the organization, or position, and any other perceived differences
Explanation: diversity explains how people staying together as a group or in a social organization are different from each other, this helps to distinguish everyone according to the relation we choose to use. For instance in an organization were we need the Hispanic to conduct a particular task, diversity helps to differentiate them.
Diversity can also be seen among people of the same culture, because they may not be of the same ages. Diversity can also be seen among people of the same culture and age, because they may not be of the same family or the same height.
<span>The correct answer is A:establishing a League of Nations. Wilson hoped that such an organization would foster communication and cooperation between nations so that they could exchange ideas more openly and lessen the idea that other nations were secretly plotting against each other. The disaster of World War I was caused in great part by a serious lack of trust and communication between the nations of Europe at that time. Wilson hoped that a League of Nations would prevent such a tragedy from happening again and included this idea in his Fourteen Points at the conclusion of the war.</span>
Answer:
<h3>The comparison and contrast of Davis and Moore’s functionalist perspective of social stratification with Mosca’s conflict perspective of social stratification lies on the concept of social position and power.</h3>
Explanation:
Davis and Moore's functionalist perspective of social stratification and Mosca’s conflict perspective of social stratification all emphasize on the presence of a power structure in a society which directly corresponds to the position of an individual. They all believed that society operates according to the social needs and that every individual performs their tasks accordingly.
The line of distinction between Davis and Moore's functionalist perspective and Mosca’s conflict perspective lies in the nature of men. Mosca believes that man is evil and dominating by nature and that compels him/her to misuse his position. He brings out the authority and power of the ruling class as an example to this argument. He argues that people in good position will eventually become more powerful as men are ambitious and selfish. They will gradually exploit people from lower position and use their power for their own personal gains.
While on the other hand, Davis and Moore argue that the greater the role of an individual is, the greater should be the reward. They illustrate the idea that people with bigger and greater roles should be given more importance because of their greater contributions to the society. Their perspective of social stratification emphasize that not everyone can perform the exclusive task of the doctors, therefore those who could perform such complicated tasks should be paid and rewarded more. Davis and Moore do not consider misuse of position and power by people of great influence.
In my opinion, Davis and Moore’s functionalist perspective of social stratification is more applicable and realistic. The fact that those who worked hard deserves a reward is a universal doctrine. These people spent a lot of effort and time before acquiring the position they are in today. Their effort and hard work should be rewarded greatly as they will contribute significantly to the society. Though, this perspective does not bring into account the chances of misuse of power and position, such elements can be controlled through efficient law and state control.