1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
GarryVolchara [31]
3 years ago
14

According to "social disorganization theory," disorganized communities contribute to criminal behavior. "Labeling theory" argues

that society labels those who do not fit the roles of law-abiding citizens. Do you think that society labels people from disorganized communities regardless of their involvement in crimes? What problems could arise if society labels law-abiding citizens who belong to disorganized communities as "criminals"? Would such citizens receive fair treatment and equal opportunities?
Law
1 answer:
vodomira [7]3 years ago
4 0

Answer:

Explanation:

The belief associated with social disorganization theory is that crimes often arise from society with destructive ecological conditions. Crime in itself is measured differently among societies. So crime rates are often linked and associated with some neighborhood because of their ecological characteristics. Weak housing, language barrier, unemployment, and other factors could affect the crime rate in certain societies depending on the law of that society.

"Labeling theory" argues that society labels those who do not fit the roles of law-abiding citizens because society sets up an acceptable behavior that is used as laid down rules for acceptable behavior. Deviance is any behavior that is good or bad depending on how it is socially constructed and considered as acceptable behaviors.

<em>Now, to the set of questions above:</em>

Do you think that society labels people from disorganized communities regardless of their involvement in crimes?

ANS:

Yes. Society views location as instrumental in influencing people's behavior. Since for instance, criminal behaviors are mostly learned behaviors, people from disorganized communities are generally considered capable of getting involved in illegal activities.

What problems could arise if society labels law-abiding citizens who belong to disorganized communities as "criminals"?

ANS:

1. Sometimes, the label given to someone could increase their tendencies for making mistakes.

2. It could impact their self-esteem.

3. It could make them start getting involved in crime.

4. It could affect their employment eligibility if they desire to seek employment out of their neighborhood.

5. It could affect how their peers see them and relate to them.

Would such citizens receive fair treatment and equal opportunities?

ANS:

NO. Since it is perceived that people of the same age group, language and other factors may share similar characteristics because they are in the same society, that would generally affect and limit opportunities and limit their fair treatment in the society.

You might be interested in
When is Half-Life 3 going to be released?
Kobotan [32]
At least we now have blinking
7 0
3 years ago
Perhatikan pernyataan berikut: 1.Menejemen 2.SDA / potensi daerah 3.Tata ruang yang bagus 4.Aparatur handal / SDM 5.Sejarah daer
Yuki888 [10]

Answer:

Explanation:

1.  Otonomi dalam manajemen pada dasarnya berarti memberikan banyak kebebasan untuk membuat pilihan di tempat kerja. Seorang manajer yang memberikan otonomi karyawan biasanya menguraikan tujuan suatu proyek tetapi memungkinkan karyawan untuk memutuskan cara terbaik untuk mencapai tujuan itu.

2. Otonomi daerah memiliki keunggulan dalam memberikan kewenangan kebijaksanaan dan inovasi kepada daerah, memungkinkan perwakilan yang lebih besar dalam proses pengaturan daerah, dan membangun keadilan hukum yang lebih baik. Kelemahan ini memicu penyimpangan oleh kepala daerah sehingga mereka terseret ke dalam kasus hukum, dan memperbesar potensi konflik kewenangan antara pemerintah pusat dan pemerintah daerah

3.  

Ada dua aliran utama penelitian yang mengevaluasi hubungan antara manusia

praktik dan kinerja sumber daya. Yang pertama adalah universalisme atau "praktik terbaik"

pendekatan. Mereka yang menggunakan pendekatan ini menunjuk ke temuan dukungan berulang untuk menunjukkan

bahwa beberapa praktik SDM, seperti intensitas perekrutan, peluang karier internal,

penilaian kinerja, sistem pelatihan formal, pembagian keuntungan, dan kompensasi insentif

didokumentasikan dengan sangat baik dalam berbagai konteks untuk menunjukkan bahwa ada universalitasnya

3 0
3 years ago
You see a sign on which there is a red circle with a red line 1 point going diagonally from left to right through the circle. Wh
lutik1710 [3]

Answer:

OB. Drivers may not make the maneuver shown on the sign

Explanation:

This is the universal "no" sign. So don't do anything that has a red arrow shown diagonally presented in a circle.

For eg, no smoking, no left turns, or no photography permitted as shown in picture below.

3 0
3 years ago
Jesse james, a 20-year old, was arrested for killing a police officer. As a newly elected prosecutor, you are responsible for pr
Nana76 [90]

It is important to note that various states use various metrics. In general, states adhere to some form of the federal procedural norms. States do have the freedom to take risks in the sake of justice.

<h3>What are federal procedural norms?</h3>

Civil process in United States district courts is governed by the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.

The Rules Enabling Act requires the United States Supreme Court to promulgate the FRCP, after which the United States Congress has seven months to veto the rules or they become part of the FRCP.

<h3>Further overview on the above legal situation is as follows:</h3>

At the first stage of the "trial," the defendant must submit a plea. This is frequently followed by a first appearance or preliminary hearing, which may involve a plea if evidence is discovered.

If there are compelling reasons to proceed, a grand jury will be formed to conduct more investigations.

A grand jury must provide evidence that justifies a capital murder trial. The district attorney's office has the same authority. The defendant is then asked if he understands the charge at a pre-trial arraignment.

A plea can also be entered here at times. If the evidence merits it, a formal writ will be sent to the court, signaling the start of a trial.

Following that, pre-trial hearings are held, and witnesses may be questioned. If the defendant claims to have an alibi, he must normally produce documentation. He must describe in full where and when he was when he was exonerated from the crime.

A mental examination may be conducted in some circumstances, particularly in capital trials. There may be a demand that multiple-count trials be heard separately in order to avoid biasing the jury (guilty of the first, more likely that he is guilty of the second).

Deposits can then be made. These are largely out-of-court testimony from witnesses that will serve as the foundation for the defense or prosecution when the trial begins.

Depending on the stage, either of these processes can be considered part of the discovery process. The defendant's record is disclosed at this point, and specific objects of evidence are given over for the defendant's comprehension.

The "Pre-Trial Conference," a relatively new federal rule, is convened to agree on specific criteria throughout the trial. The goal is to speed up the trial and streamline the procedure in general.

The defendant might then request that the case be transferred to another jurisdiction.

Learn more about justice:
brainly.com/question/22967374
#SPJ4

7 0
2 years ago
This hearing resulted from a violation of an agreement made during a plea bargain two months prior. What point in the criminal j
ira [324]

The point in the criminal justice process the whistle-blowing would have occurred is called the count bargaining.

There are also other three different types of plea bargaining, which are the charge bargaining, the sentence bargaining, and the facto bargaining.

<h3 /><h3>What is count bargaining?</h3>

Corresponds to a negotiation where the confession is related to the count bargain, that is, when the suspicions are not recognized the prosecutor can ignore the guilt in suspicions of a confession.

This occurs through the defendant alleging only one of the original charges, the others then being dropped. An example of a count bargain occurs when a prosecution accuses an individual of assault and theft, and the parties decide that the defendant will plead only guilt on the assault charge, so the prosecution will ignore the defendant's guilt on the theft charge.

Therefore, the count bargaining is a process of fairness that the allegation is in respect of the accused of the allegations, being a form of negotiaton.

Find out more about count bargaining here:

brainly.com/question/11819753

#SPJ1

8 0
1 year ago
Other questions:
  • Which political party best represents your vision of government?
    13·2 answers
  • What force young children to go on streets to star live there
    15·1 answer
  • John, owner of Big John bowling alley company, pounds on your car window, yelling angrily, you just took my spot! If you don't m
    13·2 answers
  • 2. Symptoms and complications of
    15·1 answer
  • Who appoints the justices? Who approves the justices? WHY?
    7·1 answer
  • Bill Tallyrand, as county assessor, entered into a fraudulent scheme at the urging of his
    6·1 answer
  • Can I punch a child? Or is that illegal?
    10·1 answer
  • Is restorative justice more effective than adversarial justice?
    10·1 answer
  • IF YOU BECOME ANGRY OR UPSET, YOU SHOULD: A. Control your emotions while driving B. Park the car and "cool down" before driving
    7·1 answer
  • 1. Explain what a criminal case is. 2. Explain what a civil case is. 3. As the judge, what is your job in a civil case?
    15·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!