1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
GarryVolchara [31]
3 years ago
14

According to "social disorganization theory," disorganized communities contribute to criminal behavior. "Labeling theory" argues

that society labels those who do not fit the roles of law-abiding citizens. Do you think that society labels people from disorganized communities regardless of their involvement in crimes? What problems could arise if society labels law-abiding citizens who belong to disorganized communities as "criminals"? Would such citizens receive fair treatment and equal opportunities?
Law
1 answer:
vodomira [7]3 years ago
4 0

Answer:

Explanation:

The belief associated with social disorganization theory is that crimes often arise from society with destructive ecological conditions. Crime in itself is measured differently among societies. So crime rates are often linked and associated with some neighborhood because of their ecological characteristics. Weak housing, language barrier, unemployment, and other factors could affect the crime rate in certain societies depending on the law of that society.

"Labeling theory" argues that society labels those who do not fit the roles of law-abiding citizens because society sets up an acceptable behavior that is used as laid down rules for acceptable behavior. Deviance is any behavior that is good or bad depending on how it is socially constructed and considered as acceptable behaviors.

<em>Now, to the set of questions above:</em>

Do you think that society labels people from disorganized communities regardless of their involvement in crimes?

ANS:

Yes. Society views location as instrumental in influencing people's behavior. Since for instance, criminal behaviors are mostly learned behaviors, people from disorganized communities are generally considered capable of getting involved in illegal activities.

What problems could arise if society labels law-abiding citizens who belong to disorganized communities as "criminals"?

ANS:

1. Sometimes, the label given to someone could increase their tendencies for making mistakes.

2. It could impact their self-esteem.

3. It could make them start getting involved in crime.

4. It could affect their employment eligibility if they desire to seek employment out of their neighborhood.

5. It could affect how their peers see them and relate to them.

Would such citizens receive fair treatment and equal opportunities?

ANS:

NO. Since it is perceived that people of the same age group, language and other factors may share similar characteristics because they are in the same society, that would generally affect and limit opportunities and limit their fair treatment in the society.

You might be interested in
Mike lives in a country in which the government owns all the property and controls all the natural resources; he likely lives in
Igoryamba
Communist country I believe.
4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What is the difference between negotiation and mediation?
Sholpan [36]

Answer:

It is D: Negotiation is a criminal matter and mediation is a civil matter.

4 0
3 years ago
A paragraph discussing which pieces of evidence, if any, could have class
NemiM [27]

Answer:

Evidence

Explanation:

In general, all forms of evidence have class or individual characteristics. Class characteristics are not unique to a particular object but place the particular bit of evidence into a group of objects. Individual characteristics narrow down the evidence to a single, individual source.

In general, all forms of evidence have class or individual characteristics. Class characteristics are not unique to a particular object but place the particular bit of evidence into a group of objects. Individual characteristics narrow down the evidence to a single, individual source.The type of handgun with which a victim is shot is a class characteristic. For example, if the bullet came from a .38 caliber handgun, every .38 caliber handgun on the planet is the possible murder weapon. However, finding a suspect’s fingerprint (an individual characteristic) on a .38 caliber handgun suggests that this .38, to the exclusion of all others, was the murder weapon. This is particularly true if the killing bullet can also be matched to this particular .38.

In general, all forms of evidence have class or individual characteristics. Class characteristics are not unique to a particular object but place the particular bit of evidence into a group of objects. Individual characteristics narrow down the evidence to a single, individual source.The type of handgun with which a victim is shot is a class characteristic. For example, if the bullet came from a .38 caliber handgun, every .38 caliber handgun on the planet is the possible murder weapon. However, finding a suspect’s fingerprint (an individual characteristic) on a .38 caliber handgun suggests that this .38, to the exclusion of all others, was the murder weapon. This is particularly true if the killing bullet can also be matched to this particular .38.Alternatively, blood recovered from a crime scene that tests show is type B (a class characteristic) could have come from any of the tens of millions of people who share this blood type. If the suspect has type B blood, he remains a suspect. From there, DNA (an individual characteristic) from the suspect and DNA from the blood evidence are tested to determine conclusively whether they match. If, however, the suspect’s blood is type A, he then is excluded as the source of the blood

7 0
2 years ago
15 points to whoever answers this :D
Leviafan [203]

Answer:

Revised the three strikes law to impose life sentence only when the new felony conviction is "serious or violent."

Explanation:

Proposition 36 modified elements of California's "Three Strikes" Law, which was approved by the state's voters in 1994. In 2004, voters rejected Proposition 66, which like the 2012 measure was an attempt to change some aspects of the original "Three Strikes" Law.

4 0
4 years ago
Why do you think the Supreme Court has upheld restrictions on free speech under some circumstances, but overturned restrictions
goblinko [34]

Answer:

Perhaps to avoid people getting emotionally hurt?

Explanation:

4 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • Why is the first amendment so important to the success of American democracy
    5·2 answers
  • If a formal complaint is filed against a mortgage lender under the Mortgage Brokers, Lenders, and Servicers Licensing Act, the l
    6·1 answer
  • Determine if the statement is true or false.
    14·2 answers
  • Why is it a good idea to physically prepare before you go into training to be a firefighter?
    11·1 answer
  • What is the answer to chicken
    11·2 answers
  • Viết đoạn văn tự sự khoảng 10 câu có yếu tố miêu tả và miêu tả nội tâm , nghị luận lớp 9
    13·2 answers
  • What is considered a "strong" GDP growth percentage, year over year?<br> It is my unit test
    9·1 answer
  • This law, which has since expired, banned the manufacturer of 19 semi-automatic guns and forbade the possession of firearms by a
    10·1 answer
  • What are the safety steps to follow when changing lane?
    14·1 answer
  • Because courts of law and equity have merged, the principles of equity are no longer applied. Group of answer choices True False
    7·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!