Answer:
traditional goal setting
Explanation:
This is traditional goal setting because the goals flow from the top down. Each organisational area then incorporates them from the top down.
Answer:
Implicit Imputed opportunity cost of time sacrifised while airport drop .
Explanation:
My friend asking me to drop at airport, & paying costs : gas used while driving, parking cost of car - has excluded certain price giving aspects.
He has included all the Explicitly quantified costs , whose payment is made to third person - like fuel & parking.
However, he has not included the implicit cost in terms of opportunity cost i.e other things sacrifised while going to drop him. Such costs payment is although not directly made to third person, but they still reflect a 'cost' as they reflect a gain sacrifised meanwhile.
In this case, it includes time sacrifised while going to drop friend at airport. That time could be used at work, which could have monetary benefits. So, this cost is eliminated to be evaluated by my friend.
Answer:
Variable, $85; absorption, $105.
Explanation:
Variable costing $85
Absorption costing $105=(85+20)
Reoccurring problem because non of the other problems would make sense in this type of situation
When using the Waterfall Approach, development activities are performed in order, with possibly minor overlap, but with little or no iteration between activities.
Explanation:
There is a seamless execution of software operation with perhaps a slight variation, but little or no repetition. User standards are identified, requirements are described and the whole system is designed, intended and tested at one moment in time for ultimate delivery.
A document-based approach better suited to structures of strongly precedent and reliable requirements.
Sometimes referred known as the great linear and sequential model, the waterfall model is also quite linear and sequential for the activity flow in this model, as its title suggests.
