Answer:
you have to pay because it's a trade instead of for an example trading a coat for a meal you would give pay money to get the object.
Explanation:
Hope this helps:)
<span>c. money is deducted from the balance on the debit card.</span>
Answer:
both Gladys and Phil
Explanation:
Based on the information provided within the question it can be said that in this scenario both Gladys and Phil are guilty of violating the Fair Housing Law. The Fair Housing law completely outlaws the refusal to sell a house or property to someone on the basis of race, color, disability, religion, sex, familial status, or national origin. Which is exactly why Gladys and Phil removed the property and did not want to sell to the minority couple.
Answer:
The correct decision would be to process further before product is sold
Explanation:
Profit if the product is sold un-assembled
Selling price $135
cost of un-assembled product ($60)
Profit on un-assembled product $75
Profit if the product is further assembled before sale
Selling price $170
Cost of un-assembled product ($60)
Cost of assembling product ($25)
Profit if the product is assembled $85
The profit increased by $10 if the product is further assembled before it is sold.
Hence the best course of action would be to further assemble the product before it is sold
Answer: $33750
Explanation:
First and foremost, we have to calculate the interest paid for the year which will be:
= $750000 X 9%
= $750000 × 0.09
= $ 67500
Therefore, the semi annual payment will them be calculated as:
= $67500 / 2
= $33750
