While many Americans know that they have a right to free speech, the lay opinion often views the degree of protection afforded by the United State Constitution as much broader than it is in reality. The First Amendment does not protect all types of speech.
The First Amendment states that “Congress shall make no law . . . abridging the freedom of speech.” While it states “Congress,” the protections are also against state government and local public officials from making any law that abridges a person’s freedom of speech. However, simply because the government cannot make a law of this nature does not mean that individuals are free to say anything that they want to. For example, employers may prohibit certain types of speech that would not violate a person’s First Amendment rights if the employer was not a public employer.
So I believe the answers would either be B or C (:
Thanks me and mark as brainliest (:
The British Parliament wanted to expand in India and wanted more control to overhaul the management that the east India company ruled in India. It failed and was replaced by the Pitts India act
B. military strategist. that's why he accomplished to conquer such a big empire in his life
In the headlines above, the best choice suitable in the statement is choice number four, which is the federal supremacy. The headlines speaks as a federal supremacy because it has the authority of making federal laws being considered by the people.
The correct answer for the question that is being presented above is this one: "Referendum." The type of election that would be<span>held to fill her office</span> is called Referendum. Referendum refers to a direct popular vote on a proposed law or constitutional amendment.
