This question asks for an essay, which is a personal task that only you can complete. However, we are still able to provide some guidance that can help you complete your work.
In her "Letter to Napoleon III," Elizabeth Barrett Browning employs several rhetorical strategies to urge Napoleon III to forgive the author Victor Hugo and free him from his imprisonment.
Browning uses ethos when she presents herself as a fair person. Ethos refers to an appeal to credibility, and Browning employs it when she agrees with Napoleon about the wrong nature of Victor Hugo's actions. She also employs a paradox to force Napoleon to pay close attention to her argument. The paradox is that, even though Victor Hugo acted against the emperor, he deserves to be free. Browning employs anaphora when she repeats the phrase "what touches you" in order to convince Napoleon of the importance of his reputation. Finally, she uses pathos (an appeal to emotion) when she highlights how grateful and admiring Napoleon's subjects will be if he pardons Victor Hugo.
Answer:
The use of inclusive language emphasizes hope for a better relationship in the future.
You could use the adjective, gaudy, to describe a noun. The noun, quail, could be used as the sentence subject (either direct or indirect). For example:
"The gaudy pheasant made the dull quail ashamed of its plain feathers."
Answer:
The correct answer is<em> "Someone has buried [the corpse] and disappeared"</em>
Explanation:
Dramatic irony is defined as a literary device in which the audience of a play knows something that the characters do not know. In the particular sentences provided the one that could be considered as a dramatic irony creator is "<em>Someone has buried [the corpse] and disappeared"</em> since the character who is expressing the disappearance of the corpse does not know what happened but the reader (or audience)does.
