Answer:
<em>stomach contractions</em>
Explanation:
<em>Panic attack: </em>The term panic attack refers to the sudden onset of terror, intense apprehension, or fear that happens in the absence of any real cause.
<em>Psychological symptoms: </em>
1. Feeling of unreality.
2. Losing control.
3. Fear of dying.
4. Smothering sensation.
<em>Physiological symptoms:</em> Heart racing, sweating, nausea, trembling, shortness of breath, dizziness, etc.
<em>Causes:</em> Severe stress, medical condition, physical causes, etc.
Narrative refer to a written passage that connects events and formed a story.
since you provide no options, deciding on the narrative point of view means that an author must choose the most suitable point of view to support it's character.
There are 3 major types of point of view :
- The 1st person point of view
- The 2nd Person point of View
- and the 3rd person point of view
Answer:
Oil spills and overfishing
Explanation:
Oil spills are the most dangerous as they harm the entire environment around them
Based on the circular flow model, the best label for number 5 would be Payments.
<h3>What is the circular flow model?</h3>
This is a model that shows how businesses and households interact in the market. It shows that both businesses and households rely on themselves for goods and services.
Households for instance, may be the ones that provide the factors of production such as labor, but they will then need finished goods and services from the market. When they get these, they will have to send payments to the firm through the market.
Find out more on the circular flow model at brainly.com/question/14406067
#SPJ1
Answer:
Explanation:
As per the Median Voter theorem expresses that " a greater part rule casting a ballot framework will choose the result generally favored by the middle voter". In this way, on account of essential political race which is intended to choose a gathering's possibility for position - being referred to .For this situation the Median Voter Theorem functions admirably in light of the fact that right now competitor need to appreciate the benefits of " Median voter Theorem" where as in the General political race which is intended to choose who possesses the position itself however in these sort of situations where a typical arrangement is accessible Median voter Theorem has it's constraints and all in all races each applicant needs to take distinctive situation on various subjects and general decisions are not uni dimensional and a large portion of the occasions these positions are politically spurred thus, that is the reason up-and-comer normally don't follow Median voter Theorem,
Example
Where up-and-comer either endeavored to follow the middle voter - Scenario where there is a nation wide or party shrewd agreement regarding a matter " Issues like battle against debasement" at that point competitor for the most part follow the Median voter hypothesis.
Second part where competitor didn't follow the middle voter hypothesis these are where applicant just need to please it's supporters or certain segment of society "Like reduction in the Tax on the well off" for these situation up-and-comer doesn't follow middle voter hypothesis.
Truly when a competitor chose to doesn't follow middle voter hypothesis applicant carried on deliberately ,in light of the fact that considering up-and-comer this diverse situation from middle voter hypothesis increment there opportunities to win or increment it's prominence in certain area of society .
To the extent the person carried on morally this absolutely has a place with the competitors claim moral standard which can not be summed up.
