Answer:
prices of all goods and services bought by US households
Explanation:
Answer:
Instructions are below.
Explanation:
Giving the following information:
Fixed costs= $240,000
Unitary variable cost= $1.97
Selling price per unit= $4.97.
First, we need to calculate the break-even point in units:
Break-even point in units= fixed costs/ contribution margin per unit
Break-even point in units= 240,000 / (4.97 - 1.97)
Break-even point in units= 80,000 units
<u>The break-even point analysis provides information regarding the number of units to be sold to cover for the fixed and variable costs.</u>
If the forecasted sales are 120,000, this means that the company will cover costs and make a profit. The margin of safety is 40,000 units.
Answer:
y = (x / 100) + 100
Explanation:
First, we need to know the amount of money that it spends on advertising for each extra unit sold. That would be equal to: 2,500 / 25 = 100
This value will be the divisor of the advertising expense (x) to obtain the variable factor of the number of units.
Since 100 units are already sold without investment, this value is taken as fixed and added.
And with the previous data, the formula remains:
y = (x / 100) + 100
Answer:1. The reason that the varsity team lost to JV team is lack of working together as a team.
2.Coach P. when selecting the rowers for the two teams should have looked at both the psychological(personality types and traits, if they are leader or followers etc.) as well as the physical aspect ( Stamina, Speed ,Coordination, Strength etc.) of each individual.
explanation:
1:Even though the varsity team consisted of the best individuals for speed , strength, coordination and endurance, they lacked the cohesiveness to perform as a unit. Each of the eight individual rowers had to be single-mindedly attuned to one another in order to synchronize their rowing and perform in unison. Unfortunately, the team also too many disruptor and lacked a leader.
2:The Coach should have experimented more by creating different scenarios to see how well the individuals responded and performed to one another in different situations when it came to a team environment. For example, putting the rowers in total control of the team's dynamics is the best hands on lesson they could ever experience. This would have allowed the rowers a deeper understanding what it take to be winner from a loser.
3.Coach P. should switch both the teams for Tuesday since after extensive observations and evaluation he has witnessed JV work as a better team. The JV team possessed better synergy, synchronization, and shared a common goal causing them to win more frequently than the Varsity team, despite the fact that the Varsity team had better individual members. In addition, there has been a precedent for switching boats. During the mid-1990’s, the Cornell Coach faced asimilar situation as Coach P. and as a result of him making the switch, both the JV and Varsity teams ended up winning the Eastern Championships. This demonstrates that it is more likely thatthe teams will win if they agree to switch. Moreover, even if Coach P. decided not to switch the teams, it would have taken quite a while to rebuild Varsity’s team structure, morale, and overall team synergy, implying that they probably would not have been ready in time to compete and win the race as the Varsity team anyway.