Answer:
False
Explanation:
Suppose a firm's CFO thinks that an externality is present in a project, but that it cannot be quantified with any precision ¾ estimates of its effect would really just be guesses. In this case, the externality should be ignored ¾ i.e., not considered at all ¾ because if it were considered it would make the analysis appear more precise than it really is. This is a false statement.
Answer:
it is not allocatively efficient
Explanation:
Monopoly is a market condition where one seller has all the market share. This leads to an inefficient market structure, an increase in the prices of goods and services and abnormal profits. A problem with adopting a fair return polity for a natural monopoly is that it is not allocatively efficient. In a monopoly, goods and services are not produced to help the economy or people.
<h2>
Clarify the assignment would be the first step john should take to increase Kerry's responsibilities.</h2>
Explanation:
Option A: If a new work is assigned or an additional work is assigned, it is necessary to first explain about the new responsibility and clarify about the assignment. This would ensure Kerry to continue the work smoothly.
Option B: Feedback is always welcome but this is not the first step to add responsibilities.
Option C: Notifying others is the responsibility of John and not Kerry. So this choice is invalid.
Option D: Accountability though it is mandatory comes only in the closure part.
Answer:
Total liabilities is $170,500
Explanation:
Warren's total liabilities at end of April comprises of the beginning balance of liabilities of $77,000 plus the notes payable signed in respect of the building acquired in the course of the year,the computation is shown below:
Beginning balance of liabilities $77,000
Notes payable $93,500
Total liabilities $170,500
The notes signed by employee of $11,700 is notes receivable as the employee is owing the company and should be classified as notes payable ,but notes receivable instead, an asset.
