Native Americans were continually pushed out of their homeland and much of the natural world of the American west was destroyed to make way for the settlers
Based on historical perspective, the South tried to justify the "<u>Chàttel Slàvery</u> by arguing that keeping slavery was a matter of states' rights, but the South also favored <u>Fúgitive Slàve Law</u> which took away Northern States' rights to protect enslaved people who had escaped to the North.
<h3>What is Chàttel Slàve?</h3>
The chàttel slàve is the form of slavery arrangement whereby an individual has the ownership of another man to work for him as he pleases, either at home or in fields.
During the debate on the abolition of slàvery between North and South, the Southern States argued that chàttel slàvery is no different than wage slàvery, and it should be the state's right to determine whether to be a slàve state or free state.
Again, during the debate, the south argued in favor of the <u>Fugitivé Slàve Law.</u> This law mandated Northerners to turn escaped slàves who moved to the North back over to their Southern owners, though it was against their rights to protect enslaved people.
Hence, in this case, it is concluded that the correct answer is Chàttel Slàvery and Fugitíve Slàve Law accordingly.
Learn more about the Fugítive Slàve Law here: brainly.com/question/9505313
Answer:
The words of Abraham Lincoln to honour the soldiers that sacrificed their lives in order “that government of the people, by the people, for the people, shall not perish from the earth” were spoken at Gettysburg, but these words apply as well to the countless soldiers that died for the cause of democracy in the war. Also, In some forms, democracy can be exercised directly by the people; in large societies, it is by the people through their elected agents. Or, in the memorable phrase of President Abraham Lincoln, democracy is government of the people, by the people, and for the people.
Explanation:
<u>Answer:</u> <em>C. Public goods</em>
<em>The correct option is the third one which says public goods.
</em>
<u>Explanation:</u>
When private sector markets are considered the public goods are not sold by them because they are not likely to give any kind of economic profit to the company.
Making of public goods affects other parties but do not affect the prices much. Hence making public goods would not be profitable for private sectors because of no effect on prices.
