The economically imperial policy of neo colonialism was championed by US.
Explanation:
US wanted to increase its sphere of influence and to have more market for their bludgeoning production and factories.
Thus they forced or made many other countries to turn towards a free market economy of which the US was a proponent and then made them a part of their own economic system.
This they did in newer economies that had recently been decolonized or became countries anew. This was to take advantage of early capitalist economies and to have their influence laid over these developing economies.
A direct result of Rosa Park's refusal to give up her seat on a Montgomery bus in 1955 was the Montgomery Bus Boycott. <span>On December 1, 1955, four days before the </span>boycott<span>began, Rosa Parks, an African-American woman, refused to yield her seat to a white man on a </span>Montgomery bus<span>.</span>
Because of the needed help in bargaining for higher wages and better working conditions.
Lincoln hoped to use a well-known figure of speech to help rouse the people to recognition of the magnitude of the ongoing debates over the legality of slavery. His use of this paraphrased metaphor is perhaps clearer when you look at some more of his speech:
"A house divided against itself cannot stand." I believe the government cannot endure permanently half slave and half free. I do not expect the Union to be dissolved — I do not expect the house to fall — but I do expect it will cease to be divided. It will become all one thing or all the other. Either the opponents of slavery will arrest the further spread of it, and place it where the public mind shall rest in the belief that it is in the course of ultimate extinction; or its advocates will push it forward till it shall become alike lawful in all the States, old as well as new — North as well as South.
As you can see, in this metaphor, the "house" refers to the Union — to the United States of America — and that house was divided between the opponents and advocates of slavery. Lincoln felt that the ideals of freedom for all and the institution of slavery could not coexist — morally, socially, or legally — under one nation. Slavery must ultimately be universally accepted or universally denied.
