1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Ronch [10]
3 years ago
13

Macro Company owns five machines that it uses in its manufacturing operations. Each of the machines was purchased four years ago

at a cost of $120,000. Each machine has an estimated life of 10 years with no expected salvage value. A new machine has become available. One new machine has the same productive capacity as the five old machines combined; it can produce 800,000 units each year. The new machine will cost $648,000, is estimated to last six years, and will have a salvage value of $72,000. A trade-in allowance of $24,000 is available for each of the old machines. These are the operating costs per unit:
Five old Machines

New Machines

Repairs

$ 0.6796

$ 0.0856

Depreciation

0.1500

0.2400

Power

0.1890

0.1036

Other operating costs

0.1620

0.0496

$ 1.1806

$ 0.4788

Ignore federal income taxes. Use the payback period method for (a) and (b).

a. Do you recommend replacing the old machines? Support your answer with computations. Disregard all factors except those reflected in the data just given.

b. If the old machines were already fully depreciated, would your answer be different? Why?

c. Using the net present value method with a discount rate of 20%, present a schedule showing whether or not the new machine should be acquired.
Business
1 answer:
Maru [420]3 years ago
8 0

Answer:

The correct answer for option a is $705,440, for (b) f the old machines were already depreciated fully, the answer would not  be different, based on the pay back period method, for (c) $1602623.78234. because the NPV is positive, New machines should be acquired.

Explanation:

Solution to the question

Given that,

(a) if the old machines are changed we get the following,

The initial cash flow = $648,000 -(5 * $24000) = $528,000

The cash flow terminal = $72,000

The net annual cash flow / the outflow of savings

                                             Old Machine          New Machines

Operating  cost per unit        $ 1.1806                  $ 0.4788

 Cost of Depreciation             <u> $ 0.1500   </u>           <u>  $0.2400 </u>

  Cash cost per unit A .B          $ 1.0306                  $ 0.2388

 The number of units               800,000                 800,000

The cash outflow                     $824480                $191040

The savings for outflow of cash is  $824480 -$ 191040 = $633440  per year

Thus,

At the year o of outflow = $528000

Year                  Inflow of cash

1                         $633440

2.                       $633440

3                        $633440

4                        $633440

5                        $633440

6.                       $633440 + $72,000 = $705,440

Now we make use of the pay back period which is one year since the amount of the whole initial outflow.

It is very important to replace the outdated machines.

(b)  If the old machines were already depreciated fully, the answer would not  be different, based on the pay back period method.

Here, cash flow is important, because depreciation is not part of cash flow, it is a part of a non-cash expense, so it is not considered.

(c) Here, if the machines are changed:

The initial cash flow becomes =  $ 528,800 (this is same values for options a)

The cash flow annually = $ 633440 (same as in option a)

The present value = $633440 * The annual present value

The factors to be considered year is = 20%, number of years = 6

so,

$633440 * 3.322551011654 = $ 2106511.12822

The cash flow terminal =  72,000

The present value = 72,000 * the present value

                                  (20%, with 6 years)

                              = 72,000 * 0.33489797666

  = $24112.65432

The net present value =$ 2106511.12822 +  $24112.65432 - 528000

 = $1602623.78234

Therefore since the NPV is reading positive, new machines should be purchased.

You might be interested in
Ryan sends Michael a letter of intent for the purchase of a tract of land. The letter of intent outlines the purchase price, the
Diano4ka-milaya [45]

Answer:

The correct answer is b. The letter of intent is an invitation to negotiate, which is not an offer.

Explanation:

The letter of intent is a document that is written as a pre-agreement between two people or two entities that have the commitment and the intention to proceed further and formalize a contract. They resemble a contract, but unlike these, it is not binding.

We may think that the fact that the letter of intent is not binding makes it lose its value or its usefulness as a practical tool. But the reality is that it serves as proof of will, and such proof may be sufficient proof for other clients or other participants to decide to withdraw.

In addition, the letter of intent itself implies the existence of a negotiation, where those easier questions usually appear, by mutual agreement. Leaving for the real contract, those more complex issues that require more negotiation.

6 0
3 years ago
A customer is dollar cost averaging by investing $400 per month into a mutual fund. Over 4 months, the customer has made purchas
Nostrana [21]

Answer:

$0.32 per share

Explanation:

For computing the lower price per share first we have to find out the average cost per share which is shown below:

1 $400 ÷ $13 = 30.769

2 $400 ÷ $10 = 40.000

3 $400 ÷ $8 = 50.000

4 $400 ÷ $9 = 44.444

$1,600  = 165.213 shares

Average cost per share = Total cost ÷ total number of shares  

                                       = $1,600 ÷ $165.213 shares

                                       = $9.68 per share

And, the average price per share is

= ($13 + $10 + $8 + $9) ÷ 4

= $10 per share

So, the lower value is

= $10 per share - $9.68 per share

= $0.32 per share

6 0
4 years ago
E15-5 (Lump-Sum Sales of Stock with Preferred Stock) Dave Matthew Inc. issues 500 shares of $10 par value common stock and 100 s
OverLord2011 [107]

Answer:

See explanation section

Explanation:

Requirement A

Journal entry for the issuance when the market price of the common shares is $165 each -

Debit         Cash (500 shares, $165 market value)      $82,500                                    

Credit        Common Stock (500 shares, $10 par value)     $5,000

Credit        Paid-in-capital in excess of Par/Additional paid-in-capital, Common stock (500 shares, $165 - $10 = $155 per share in excess of par) $77,500

Journal entry for the issuance when the market price of the preferred share is $230 each -

Debit         Cash (100 shares, $230 market value)      $23,000                                    

Credit        Preferred Stock (100 shares, $100 par value)     $10,000

Credit        Paid-in-capital in excess of Par/Additional paid-in-capital, Preferred stock (100 shares, $230 - $100 = $130 per share in excess of par) $13,000

Requirement B

Journal entry for the issuance when only the market price of the common stock is $170 per share -

Debit         Cash (500 shares, $170 market value)      $85,000                                    

Credit        Common Stock (500 shares, $10 par value)     $5,000

Credit        Paid-in-capital in excess of Par/Additional paid-in-capital, Common stock (500 shares, $170 - $10 = $160 per share in excess of par) $80,000

As preferred stock's market price is not given, the par value becomes the market value for the preferred stock. The journal to entry to record preferred stock -

Debit         Cash (100 shares, $100 market value)      $10,000                                    

Credit        Preferred Stock (100 shares, $100 par value)     $10,000

5 0
3 years ago
CAN SOMEONE PLEASE HELP ME if management wishes to evaluate the amount of assets that were financed by creditors they could use
Reika [66]

B) Debt to total assets ratio

This ratio is calculated by total debt divided by total assets and shows the percentage of assets that are financed by creditors.

4 0
3 years ago
For each of the following, state whether the events created are mutually exclusive and whether they are collectively exhaustive.
8_murik_8 [283]

Answer:

Explanation:

- mutually exclusive (ME): If one event occur the other doesn't

- collectively exhaustive (CE): one of the events must occur

a. Undergraduate business students were asked whether they were sophomores or juniors: ME

b. Each respondent was classified by the type of car he or she drives: sedan, SUV, American, European, Asian, or none. ME - CE

c. people were asked, "Do you currently live in (i) an apartment or (ii) a house?": ME

d. A product was classified as defective or not defective: ME - CE

7 0
4 years ago
Other questions:
  • Name 3 negative scenarios that could potentially damage your credit score
    8·1 answer
  • A program that performs specific tasks that the user wants to carry out is called ________
    5·1 answer
  • Suppose that you could either prepare your own tax return in 15 hours or hire a tax specialist to prepare it for you in 2 hours.
    12·1 answer
  • Anyone who is at least 18 years old, a citizen of the United States, and a legal resident may vote in an election. To become a s
    15·1 answer
  • Suppose Valerie is an avid reader and buys only mystery novels. Valerie deposits $2,000 in a bank account that pays an annual no
    14·1 answer
  • What is a customer retention?
    9·2 answers
  • What is the relationship between marketing and economics?​
    5·1 answer
  • When adjusting the bank balance in a bank reconciliation, which item must be added to the bank balance?
    15·1 answer
  • A marketing plan includes this marketing objective: "Create positive feelings about our brand." What is the main problem with th
    8·1 answer
  • A __________ bond gives the bondholder the right to cash in the bond before maturity at a specific price after a specific date.
    15·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!