Answer:
Your stock will be valued in $20,838.
Explanation:
If there are no taxes, it is expected that the value of the stock will lower the amount of the dividend. That means
Stock price (April 19) = stock price - dividend = 93-2.4=90.6 $/share
In this case, your stock of 230 shares will be valued as
Stock value = Stock share * stock price = 230 shares * $90.6/share
Stock value = $ 20,838
Your stock will be valued in $20,838.
SWOT analysis is a framework for identifying and analyzing a company's strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats. these words make up the SWOT acronym.
The number one intention of SWOT analysis is to boom focus of the factors that cross into creating a business choice or establishing a commercial enterprise approach.
SWOT analysis is a strategic planning and strategic management method used to assist a person or business enterprise pick out Strengths, Weaknesses, opportunities, and Threats related to commercial enterprise opposition or project-making plans. it is every now and then known as situational evaluation or situational evaluation.
A SWOT evaluation is a planning tool that seeks to perceive the Strengths, Weaknesses, opportunities and Threats concerned in a task or agency. it is a framework for matching an employer's dreams, programs and capacities to the surroundings wherein it operates.
Learn more about SWOT analysis here:brainly.com/question/25066799
#SPJ4
Answer:
<u>Contribution Margin Income Statement for the year end MM DD, YY</u>
$ $
Sales revenue ($100 per unit) 66,000
Less: Variable Cost
Less cost of goods sold ($56 per unit) 36,960
Commissions expense ($6 per unit) 3,960
Shipping expense ($3 per unit) <u> 1,980 </u>
<u> 42,900 </u>
Contribution Margin 23,100
Less: Fixed Cost
Salaries expense 7,900
Advertising expense <u> 5,800 </u>
<u> 13,700 </u>
Net Income <u> 9,400</u>
The correct answers to these open questions are the following.
Maple Farms, Inc. v. City School District of Elmira.
Could something like this bankrupt a company?
Yes, it can, if the proper forecast were not done taking into consideration all of the possible variables at medium and long-range.
Do you agree with the decision?
It was a tough decision because the court declared in its decision that the performance was not impracticable, as Maple Farm Inc indicated when decided to break the contract.
In strict theory, I agree with the court's decision because the explanation was that an "impractical" occurred when an event happened totally unexpected. And in this case, Mapple Farm Inc could have taken extra provisions knowing that milk had a 10% increase the last year and had the chance of more increases in the present year.
That is how a company can avoid this type of situation. Taking better provisions, contemplating all kinds of variables, knowing that in the future, something unexpected can happen and could be prevented with the proper forecast.
