Answer:
The answer is C. Debit to Supplies for $2,800
Explanation:
Supplies of worth $6,000 was purchased in Aug.
And on Aug. 31, $3,200 balance was left.
That means $2,800($6,000 - $3,200) has been used.
The supplies expense account will he debited for $2,800.
Note that expense increases with debit and credit decreases expense.
Option B, D, E are wrong because the expense increases and not decreases.
the Answer Is C , not sure if this is 100% correct
Answer:
-$720 unfavorable
Explanation:
The computation of the material quantity variance is shown below:
= Standard Price × (Standard Quantity - Actual Quantity)
= $18 per pound × (610 pounds - 650 pounds)
= $18 per pound × -40 pounds
= -$720 unfavorable
Simply we take the difference between the standard quantity and the actual quantity and then multiply it by the standard price so that the correct value can come
Answer: weakness
Cashiers are not bonded. Cash is not adequately protected from theft. Inability to establish responsibility for cash with a specific clerk. The accountant should not handle cash. Cash is not independently counted.
Principal: Segregation of Duties.Human Resource Controls.Independent Internal Verification.Documentation Procedures Physical Controls.Establishment of Responsibility.
Explanation:
There should be separate cash drawers and register codes for each clerk. A cashier office supervisor should count cash. The cashier’s department should make the deposits. All cashiers should be bonded. Cash should be stored in a safe until it is deposited in the bank.
Answer:
C) One worker can easily sabotage the productivity of other workers.
Explanation:
This is a form of compensation by merit that comprises the performance of a team as a whole, so this is a way of motivating both group work and individual work.
In the scenario above, we can see that this compensation plan would be effective in leveraging the performance of individual workers, and of teams, because if each member of the team is more productive, it will benefit the team as a whole. And this method will not affect the productivity of other teams, as each team will be encouraged and engaged to do the best job possible to achieve merit pay.
The alternative that does not correspond to the question that this incentive may be better than other methods to motivate workers to work harder, is the one that says that a worker can sabotage the productivity of other workers, as that worker is also likely to be engaged in not sabotaging the work of other team members, as the remuneration bonuses depend on the effort of the entire team to work together, and not just one employee.
