Answer:
$42.5 billion
Explanation:
the expected value formula = ∑ (valueₙ x probabilityₙ)
expected value = (low value x probability of low value) + (most likely value x probability of most likely value) + (high value x probability of high value)
= ($5 billion x 20%) + ($45 billion x 70%) + ($100 billion x 10%) = $1 billion + $31.5 billion + $10 billion = $42.5 billion
Answer:
Please check the answer below
Explanation:
a. One issue is the "locking-in" of assets. If I hold shares of Corporation X, then I can delay paying taxes as long as I don't sell. Effectively, I get to keep all of the interest/dividend payments on my tax liability. However, if I discover that X is really a poor investment and Corporation Y is better, then selling X and buying Y means that I have to pay taxes. This might discourage me from making a switch to a more profitable/efficient investment decision. This is the "locking-in" effect.
b. A short-run cut might cause many people to sell stocks that they had felt "locked-in" with. The penalty for switching is smaller, so more people will do it -- resulting in a great deal of cap gains tax revenue collected.
c. Taxing realized gains, even when the stock is not sold, rather than just accrued gains would eliminate this locking-in effect. Investors would not be penalized for switching to a better investment, and long-term capital gains revenue (as well as efficiency) would rise.
Answer:
You will feel stronger once you gain a bit of flexibility, simply because that flexibility gives you the range of motion to let your muscles work more efficiently. Maintaining flexibility will aid in muscle and joints health, which can keep older adults doing their favorite daily activities and remain independent.
Answer:
The correct answer is: The fallacy of composition.
Explanation:
The fallacy of composition refers to the usually mistaken idea that an individual has in which because a component of a whole is a certain way, the whole is that very certain way, too. The fallacy of composition is a simplified, subjective generalization that individuals come up with where there is not enough proof that the statement being provided is real.
Thus, <em>as George believes Lillian is arrogant because she is part of the LGP groups and George has met previous LGP members who are arrogant, he is assuming all LGP members are arrogant. George has fallen into the composition fallacy.</em>
Answer:
This firm should hire less of C and more of D
Explanation:
Based on the information given we were told that the price of resource C is the amount of $90 while the price of resource D is the amount of $35 ,Therefore based on this it will be advisable for the firm to hire less of C and More of D because the price of resource is C is more higher than the price of resource D when compared, which means that the price of resource D is the best option or alternative for the firm to go for.
