Answer:
Adjusting entry
Date Account Title Debit Credit
Interest receivables $4,000
($600,000*8%*1/12)
Interest revenue $4,000
(To record accrued interest on note)
The style of interaction might seem to be the only way for couples whose backgrounds are completely irreconcilable to survive is obliteration style.
Some couples will try the obliteration fashion. In this situation, each partner tries to erase or obliterate their authentic cultures and create a brand new “subculture” with new beliefs, values, and behaviors.
Style of interaction for an intercultural couple in which both companions try and erase their character cultures.
Culture is a prime component that transforms passionate love into romantic love. Cultural values and traditional behaviors affect the expressions and reports of love and transfer passionate love as primarily based on a sexual attraction into romantic love as an idealized and culturally affected manner of loving.
Learn more about obliteration style here brainly.com/question/17134967
#SPJ4
Answer:
The correct answer is letter "B": A car manufacturer installing expensive onboard GPS/navigation systems in all the cars it sells.
Explanation:
A tying agreement is the type of contractual arrangement where a seller offers other(s) product for the purchase of one good as a part of only one bundle. The secondary product might not be necessary but the seller offers it mainly to generate more profit. Tying arrangements are considered anti-competitive practices.
Answer:
Retained earning balance at the end would be = $205,000
Explanation:
Retained earnings at the end = Retained earning at the beginning + Net income - Dividend paid
The net income would increase the balance of the retained earnings hence it is added to it.
The Dividend paid would be a cash outflow which would reduce the balance of the retained earnings, hence it is deducted from it.
So applying this to the question, we have
Retained earning balance at the end would be:
25,000 + 200,000 - 20,000 = $205,000
Retained earning balance at the end would be = $205,000
Answer:
Multiplier effect in the 4th round = 3.58
Explanation:
A change in aggregate demand can create a much greater impact in the equilibrium national income. This is known as the multiplier effect. This occurs when injections of new demand for goods and services into the circular flow of income creates further rounds of spending. For example, if the government spending was on building new affordable houses then the need for housing materials will create demand for wood, cement and other housing supplies. Thus, these businesses will see a rise in sales. Whilst they benefit through profits, their employees would benefit from wages and salaries. As their income rises, they will spend it in the economy, and so will the businesses from their profits. This additional rounds of spending is the multiplier effect.
If a 100 increase creates 33 for the second round, it is 33% (33/100 x 100) i.e. 100 x 33% = 33
This is proven since 33 x 33% = 10.89 in the third round.
Hence, the multiplier effect in the forth round = 10.89 x 33% = 3.58
