1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
meriva
3 years ago
5

Which two disadvantages are associated with collaborative business message writing?

Business
1 answer:
sattari [20]3 years ago
3 0

Answer:

It may lead to groupthink.

It may affect the message's clarity.

Explanation:

Collaborative business message writing has to do with when a group of people creates a project or business message together rather than doing it individually.

Groupthink describes when a group sets asides their personal belief to get a consensus within a group and this can lead to bad decisions as members of the group can sidestep problems in order to fit into a group's decisions.

The clarity of the message can be affected because the different members of the group all have different ideas and would try to sacrifice some of their ideas for the group.

You might be interested in
Once a project is underway, the project manager is responsible for the:_______a. people. b. cost. c. time. d. All of these
kati45 [8]

Answer:

I think the answer is D. All of the above

Explanation:

5 0
2 years ago
Two investment opportunities are as follows:________. Alt A Alt B First Cost 200 100 Uniform annual benefit 32 27 End of useful
Talja [164]

Answer:

Since the 4.34 NPV of Alt A is greater than the 2.35 NPV of Alt B, it therefore implies that Alt A should be selected.

Explanation:

Note: The data in the question are merged together. They are therefore sorted before answering the question as follows:

                                                          Alt A              Alt B

First Cost                                           200                 100

Uniform annual benefit                       32                   27

End of useful life salvage value         20                    0

Useful life, in years                              10                     5

The explanation to the answer is now given as follows:

a. Calculation of NPV of Alt A

First Cost = 200

PV of uniform annual benefit = P * ((1 - (1 / (1 + r))^n) / r) ……………………. (2)

Where;

P = uniform annual benefit = 32

r = MACC = 10%, or 0.10

n = number of useful years = 10

Note: The formula for calculating the present value of ordinary annuity is being used here to calculate the Present Value (PV) of uniform annual benefit.

Substitute the values into equation (1) to have:

PV of uniform annual benefit = 32 * ((1 - (1 / (1 + 0.10))^10) / 0.10) = 32 * 6.14456710570468 = 196.63

PV of Salvage value = FV / (1 + r)^n ..................... (2)

Where;

FV = End of useful life salvage value = 20

r = MACC = 10%, or 0.10

n = number of useful years = 10

Note: The normal formula for calculating the present value (PV) is being used here to calculate the PV of Salvage value

Substitute the values into equation (2) to have:

PV of Salvage value = 20 / (1 + 0.10)^10 = 20 / 2.5937424601 = 7.71

Net present value (NPV) of Alt .A = PV of uniform annual benefit + PV of Salvage value - First cost = 196.63 + 7.71 - 200 = 4.34

b. Calculation of NPV of Alt B

First Cost = 100

PV of uniform annual benefit = P * ((1 - (1 / (1 + r))^n) / r) ……………………. (3)

Where;

P = uniform annual benefit = 27

r = MACC = 10%, or 0.10

n = number of useful years = 5

Note: The formula for calculating the present value of ordinary annuity is also being used here to calculate the Present Value (PV) of uniform annual benefit.

Substitute the values into equation (3) to have:

PV of uniform annual benefit = 27 * ((1 - (1 / (1 + 0.10))^5) / 0.10) = 27 * 3.79078676940845 = 102.35

NPV of Alt B = PV of uniform annual benefit - First cost = 102.35 – 100 = 2.35

c. Decision

Since the 4.34 NPV of Alt A is greater than the 2.35 NPV of Alt B, it therefore implies that Alt A should be selected.

6 0
3 years ago
(Last Word) According to Yale University's Environmental Performance Index (EPI), A) growth in GDP per person initially improves
tatiyna

Answer:

B) countries with higher GDP per person tend to have healthier environments.

Explanation:

According to the 2020 Environmental Performance Index (EPI) elaborated by Yale and Columbia universities, a strong positive correlation exists between high GDP per capita and healthier environments. There are a few exceptions to this correlation, in Asian (especially Arab) countries where GDP per capita might be high, but the vast majority of income is received by a vary small number of people. But in the rest of the world, a high GDP per capita generally results in healthier environments.

7 0
3 years ago
Trevor always begins the day with a strawberry milkshake (milk (x1 ) and strawberries(x2) mixed in proportion 1:5). His income i
jenyasd209 [6]

Answer:

Check the explanation

Explanation:

Going by the question that the proportion of milk and strawberry for milk shake is 1:5.

If amount of milk is to be X1 that means the quantity of strawberry (X2) will be 5×X1, i.e., X2=5X1... Equation 1

And in addition, the milk and strawberry are complementary consumables as strawberry is of no use without milk and vice versa.

Budget equation will be as follows:

P1×X1+P2×5X1=M.... Equation 2

Given M=200, P1=15 & P2=1

Putting values in Equation 2

15×X1+1×5X1=200

X1=10 & X2=50(from equation 1)

Answer a)

With change in P1 from 15 to 5

Again putting values in Equation 2

5×X1+1×5X1=200

X1=20 & X2=100.

The total change in the demand of milk will increase from 10 units to 20 units.

Answer b)

Strawberry and milk are complementary goods here for that reason there would be no effect on substitution.

Answer c)

Since there will be no effect on substitution, total effect will be equal to income effect.

7 0
3 years ago
A stock will pay no dividends for the next 3 years. Four years from now, the stock is expected to pay its first dividend in the
vesna_86 [32]

Answer:

$24.59 or $24.6 or $25

Explanation:

Value of the share is the present value of dividend associated with that share. We need to calculate the present value of each dividend at year 2 and add them to determine the value of the share.

As given there is no dividend for 3 years,next dividend of $2.4 dividend will be discounted for two years and $3 dividend for three years. After that we need to calculate the  present value using DVM and discount this value for 4 years.

Value of Stock = [ $2.4 (1+14%)^-2 ] + [ $3 (1+14%)^-3 ] + [ $3(1+5%) / (14%-5%) ] x (1+14%)^-4

Value of Stock = $1.85 + $2.02 + $20.72 = $24.59

8 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • When the lorillard tobacco company places ads discouraging teenagers from smoking, they are using which type of institutional ad
    6·1 answer
  • PackMan Corporation has semiannual bonds outstanding with nine years to maturity and the bonds are currently priced at $754.08.
    9·1 answer
  • Republic Industries decides to price delivery services according to the results of a recent activity-based costing (ABC) study.
    13·1 answer
  • PLEASE HELP ASAP!!! (There are 5 questions)
    14·1 answer
  • 1.
    5·2 answers
  • Portside Watercraft uses a job order costing system. During one month Portside purchased $173,000 of raw materials on credit; is
    8·1 answer
  • Assume you are the internal controls expert for your company. Your boss has read about Madoff’s Ponzi scheme described in a page
    8·1 answer
  • "Zurich Company reports pretax financial income of $70,000 for 2014. The following items cause taxable income to be different th
    7·1 answer
  • A property title search firm is contemplating using online software to increase the productivity of the researcher performing th
    6·1 answer
  • The substitution effect of an increase in the price of Raisin Bran refers to Select one: a. the decrease in the demand for Raisi
    15·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!