1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Bas_tet [7]
3 years ago
13

Solve for x. x2 - 2x - 24 = 0 -4, -6 -4, 6 2, -6 4, 6 NextReset

Mathematics
2 answers:
Katena32 [7]3 years ago
4 0
-4,6
x^2 - 2x - 24 = 0
Factorise the equation
Products are -6 and 4
(x-6) (x+4) = 0
x = 6 and x = -4

Hope it helped!
ikadub [295]3 years ago
4 0
B. -4,6 is the right answer for this
You might be interested in
Angel bought 5 chickens for $6.50. What’s the unit cost of one wing
Pie

Answer:

1.3

Step-by-step explanation:

6.50/5

6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
PLEASE HELP. zoom in to remove blur
AleksAgata [21]

Answer:

It's A

Step-by-step explanation:

It's just moving the equation to the right 4 units. There's no stretch, compression, or reflection.

5 0
2 years ago
Ve. .
Alinara [238K]

Answer:

They are (6, 1) or (3, 2).

Step-by-step explanation:

The factor pairs of 6 are 1×6 and 2×3

So the parallelogram (height by length) could be:

1 by 6

2 by 3

3 by 2

6 by 1.

3 0
3 years ago
Country Financial, a financial services company, uses surveys of adults age and older to determine if personal financial fitness
Yakvenalex [24]

Complete Question

Country financials, a financial services company, uses surveys of adults age 18 and older to determine if personal financial fitness is changing over time. In February 2012, a sample of 1000 adults showed 410 indicating that their financial security was more that fair. In Feb 2010, a sample of 900 adults showed 315 indicating that their financial security was more than fair.

a

State the hypotheses that can be used to test for a significant difference between the population proportions for the two years.

b

What is the sample proportion indicating that their  financial security was more that fair in 2012?In 2010?

c

Conduct the hypothesis test and compute the p-value.At a .05 level of significance what is your conclusion?

Answer:

a

The null hypothesis is  H_o :  p_1 = p_2

The  alternative hypothesis is   H_a :  p_1  \ne  p_2

b

in 2012  \r  p_1  =0.41

in 2010  \r  p_2  =0.35  

c

The  p-value  is  p-value = 0.0072

The conclusion is

There is  sufficient evidence to conclude that the proportion of those indicating that  financial security is more fair in Feb 2010 is different from the proportion of  those indicating that financial security is more fair in Feb 2012.

Step-by-step explanation:

From the question we are told that

   The  sample size in 2012 is  n_1  =  1000

    The  number that indicated that their finance was more than fail is  k  =  410  

     The  sample  size in 2010  is  n_2  =  900

   The  number that indicated that their finance was more than fail is  u  =  315

     The  level of significance is  \alpha  =  0.05[/ex]The null hypothesis is  [tex]H_o :  p_1 = p_2

The  alternative hypothesis is   H_a :  p_1  \ne  p_2

Generally the sample proportion for  2012 is mathematically represented as

     \r  p_1  =  \frac{k}{n_1}

=>   \r  p_1  =  \frac{410}{1000}

=>   \r  p_1  =0.41

Generally the sample proportion for  2010 is mathematically represented as

      \r  p_2  =  \frac{u}{n_2}

=>   \r  p_2  =  \frac{315}{900}

=>   \r  p_2  =0.35    

Generally the pooled sample proportion is mathematically represented as

      \r p =  \frac{k + u }{n_1 + n_2}

=>     \r p =  \frac{410 + 315 }{1000+ 900}

=>      \r p =  0.3816

Generally the test statistics is mathematically represented as

     z =  \frac{( \r p_1 - \r p_2 ) - 0}{\sqrt{\r p (1 - \r p ) ( \frac{1}{n_1} +\frac{1}{n_2} )}  }

 z =  \frac{( 0.41 -0.35 ) - 0}{\sqrt{0.3816 (1 - 0.3816 ) ( \frac{1}{1000} +\frac{1}{900} )}  }    

 

 z =  \frac{( 0.41 -0.35 ) - 0}{\sqrt{0.3816 (1 - 0.3816 ) ( \frac{1}{1000} +\frac{1}{900} )}  }

   z  =  2.688

Generally the p- value  is mathematically represented as  

      p-value = 2 P(Z >2.688  )

From the z -table  

      P(Z > 2.688) = 0.0036

So  

      p-value = 2 *0.0036

        p-value = 0.0072

So from the p-value  obtained we see that p-value  <  \alpha so we reject the null hypothesis

Thus there is  sufficient evidence to conclude that the proportion of financial security is more fair in Feb 2010 is different from the proportion of financial security is more fair in Feb 2012.

5 0
3 years ago
In a writing competition, the first place winner receives 1/2 of the prize money. The second runner up receives 1/4 of what the
worty [1.4K]

Answer:

10,000 is the total amount of.money that was distributed

6 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • The height of an equilateral triangle is 13 feet. The triangles area is 39 feet squared. What is the perimeter of the triangle?
    10·1 answer
  • In a whole 40% is 1380 what does the other 60% equal
    7·1 answer
  • Solve 765/14 and write your answer in terms of a mixed number (please use this format: 75 3/5). *
    11·2 answers
  • HELP PLEASE ASAP PLEASE HELP ASAP
    10·1 answer
  • Which of the following events has a probability of 75% or higher?
    14·1 answer
  • Which expression is equivalent to 2n + 3n - 0.32n? A.5.32n
    15·1 answer
  • Can someone that’s really smart actually help me with this
    8·1 answer
  • 69+69+69+69+69+69+6?
    15·2 answers
  • If the measure of ZBEC is (2x+3)° and x = 30, which expression could represent the measure of ZAED?
    5·1 answer
  • Multiply and simplify (x+1)^3x(x+1)^4
    9·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!