Answer:
This is an example of a failure of deductive reasoning.
Explanation:
Deductive reasoning is one that first analyzes two premises to reach a conclusion. If the text shown in the question above were an example of deductive reasoning done correctly, we should read: "we do not know B, nor C and therefore we cannot say that they are equal to A."
However, we see the narrator of the text presenting conclusions without evaluating the premises, presenting a false conclusion. This is an example of inductive reasoning failure.
<span>-Athena is much more worried for Odysseus
-Zeus is more nonchalant
-He decides that he will let Odysseus leave island but he must pass test of harships in order to prove he's a great warrior
-This is also Athena's problem because she sent the winds that destroyed Odysseus' ship</span>
Racism might still exist because people live in the past. Such as teaching their children to continue seeking their race as the supreme and better race over the rest. Some people might just be affected by one person from an entire race. Such as a shooting of a white person done by a black person. This can be seen as hatred towards all black people hated because of one person doing such a crime. (My opinion)
I do believe it we can trust studies because it’s real information that has been recorded
Answer:
C.) The line breaks make sure that the reader slows down as they read
Explanation:
The poem has these breaks in the lines to serve as a way for the reader to see the emphasize on the meaning behind the words.
"What your mother tells you
now
in time
you will come to know",
The bolded words are read slower and the meaning is emphasized on them compared to if the poem were written as, "What your mother tells you now in time you will come to know." Thus these breaks trigger the reader to slow down and fathom the meaning of the words more.
