Answer:
x < -7
Step-by-step explanation:
-4x > 28
-x > 7
x < -7
It would be 6.0x4 because the square is 6.0 on each side
Answer:
Option B.
Step-by-step explanation:
The given expression is
![5p+3p+(-9)](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=5p%2B3p%2B%28-9%29)
We need to find an expression which is equivalent to the given expression.
Combine like terms.
![(5p+3p)-9](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%285p%2B3p%29-9)
![8p-9](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=8p-9)
The simplified form of given expression is 8p-9. So, option A is incorrect.
In option B, the given expression
![3(p+(-3))+5p](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=3%28p%2B%28-3%29%29%2B5p)
![3(p-3)+5p](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=3%28p-3%29%2B5p)
Using distributive property, we get
![3p-9+5p](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=3p-9%2B5p)
Combined liker terms.
![(5p+3p)-9](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%285p%2B3p%29-9)
![8p-9](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=8p-9)
It is same as the simplified form of given expression.
Therefore, the expression 3(p+(-3))+5p is equivalent to the given expression and correct option is B.
Answer:
-7.045 is greater
Step-by-step explanation:
Because -7.045 is closer to 0