Cash generated by the regular operations of a business; usually computed as net income plus or minus the effects of other current assets and current liabilities on cash flows, plus noncash expenses deducted in arriving at net income, minus noncash revenues included, less certain gains and plus any losses that are included in the total proceeds received from sale of fixed assets is given below
Explanation:
- Cash flows from operating activities show the net amount of cash received or disbursed during a given period for items that normally appear on the income statement. You can calculate these cash flows using either the direct or indirect method.
- The direct method deducts from cash sales only those operating expenses that consumed cash. This method converts each item on the income statement directly to a cash basis.
- Alternatively, the indirect method starts with accrual basis net income and indirectly adjusts net income for items that affected reported net income but did not involve cash.
- The Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 95 encourages use of the direct method but permits use of the indirect method.
- Whenever given a choice between the indirect and direct methods in similar situations, accountants choose the indirect method almost exclusively. The American Institute of Certified Public Accountants reports that approximately 98% of all companies choose the indirect method of cash flows.
- The direct method converts each item on the income statement to a cash basis.
- The indirect method adjusts net income (rather than adjusting individual items in the income statement) for (1) changes in current assets (other than cash) and current liabilities, and (2) items that were included in net income but did not affect cash.
- The most common example of an operating expense that does not affect cash is depreciation expense.
If Adidas lowers its price, there would be a shift to a shift in demand to the left.
An increase in the wages of labor would lead to a shift in supply to the left.
As a result of the report, there would be a shift in demand to the right.
The arrest of the celebrity will neither shift demand or supply.
A decrease in the price of Adidas' shoes will neither shift demand or supply.
<h3>What cause a change in demand?</h3>
- A change in consumers' expectation : when there is a favourable change in this factor, the demand curve would shift to the right. When the change is unfavourable, there would be a shift to the left.
- A change in the taste of consumers : when there is a favourable change in this factor, the demand curve would shift to the right. When the change is unfavourable, there would be a shift to the left.
- A change in consumer's income: : when there is a favourable change in this factor, the demand curve would shift to the right. When the change is unfavourable, there would be a shift to the left.
- A change in the price of substitute goods: when the price of the substitute good increases, the demand for the good would increase. The opposite is the case when the price of the substitute good decreases.
Here is the complete question:
Nike is wondering how Adidas's decision to lower its prices will affect Nike.
2. Apple, which makes the iPhone, is forced to pay its workers higher wages.
3. A new report indicates that eating hot dogs can prevent cancer.
4. Adidas decides to lower the prices of its shoes.
5. A celebrity who endorses Subway is arrested.
For more information about the change in demand, please check: brainly.com/question/25871620
Answer:
Option A Penetration Pricing Strategy
Explanation:
The lowest price set below the market price for a long term period is known as Penetration Pricing Strategy. The reason is that the penetration pricing strategy helps the company to make maximum profit by using the price demand relation. In this scenario the company is setting a price which is lowest price in the market and this price brings maximum number of sales and profits. This lowest price makes the competitor's prices unattractive.
The answer is B. It’s B because I really don’t know I just said something
Answer:
understate economic welfare, because it does not take into account increases in leisure
Explanation:
While GDP is often used as an index to assess the standard of living of a state or country, there are a number of limitations to this indicator. GDP does not take into account entertainment, health and education costs, off-market operations, nature of the environment etc.
Therefore the second option is correct
