D. Both democracy and the United States would endure<span>.</span> is the answer.
Answer:
In the area of "reapportionment"
Explanation:
Budgetary accountability was the benchmark of the Bellmon administration. On account of his position on sales taxes, he attempted to build up the state budget. The new chief executive particularly confronted issues in financing the state's schooling division. Bellmon accepted that cuts and revamping in training could set aside cash. Teachers, nonetheless, clamored for a salary increment, and both the Oklahoma Education Association and the National Education Association voted sanctions against the state.
In 1965 the council increased teacher's salaries through increment in cigarette taxes and an expansion in the valuation of foreseen state income.
Quite possibly the most problems that are begging to be addressed standing up to Bellmon included reapportionment of the governing body, which was overwhelmed by meagerly populated provincial territories.
The U.S. High Court settled the issue by deciding that the state must be divided by populace. A completely reallocated assembly met in January 1965 with 33% of the solons coming from Oklahoma and Tulsa regions.
The CCC (Civilian Conservation Corps) employed about 30,000+ people, who helped build things like dams, roads, bridges, fences, signage, and campgrounds in South Carolina.
Tyranny, as aristotle said is “Any sole ruler, who is not required to give an account of himself, and who rules over subjects all equal or superior to himself to suit his own interest and not theirs, can only be exercising a tyranny.”
I would be hard to argue that the Renaissance even impacted everyone directly.
The best answer to this is that the Renaissance created a period of social and economic upheaval that changed people's lives. Change is not always good and people were uprooted and put into new situations as a result.
