1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Snezhnost [94]
3 years ago
9

Researchers in City X recently discovered low levels of several pharmaceutical drugs in public drinking water supplies. However,

the researchers argued that the drugs in the water were not a significant public health hazard. They pointed out that the drug levels were so low that they could only be detected with the most recent technology, which suggested that the drugs may have already been present in the drinking water for decades, even though they have never had any discernible health effects.
Which of the following, if true, would most strengthen the researchers' reasoning?

A. If a drug found in drinking water is not a significant public health hazard, then its presence in the water will not have any discernible health effects.

B. There is no need to remove low levels of pharmaceutical drugs from public drinking water unless they present a significant public health hazard.

C. Even if a substance in drinking water is a public health hazard, scientists may not have discerned which adverse health effects, if any, it has caused.

D. Researchers using older, less sensitive technology detected the same drugs several decades ago in the public drinking water of a neighboring town but could find no discernible health effects.

E. Samples of City X's drinking water taken decades ago were tested with today's most recent technology, and none of the pharmaceutical drugs were found.
Social Studies
1 answer:
Vinvika [58]3 years ago
6 0

Answer:

A. If a drug found in drinking water is not a significant public health hazard, then its presence in the water will not have any discernible health effects.

Explanation:

The researchers' maintained a point of view that, the low levels of the drugs found in the water poses no significant threat to public health.

Therefore their reasoning would be most strengthened by the answer "A" chosen above because it implies that;

low levels of the drugs have been present in water over time, and yet, no health effects have been detected previously. Therefore, even if the technology to detect such low levels of the drugs is now available, it shouldn't change the fact that such levels of the drug is still not a significant health hazard.

You might be interested in
As a school administrator, you have been asked to identify students who have scored at the 50th percentile or above on the Wechs
Marta_Voda [28]

Answer:

100 or higher

Explanation:

The Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children- Revised is a scale that tries to measure intelligence based on ten abilities. In addition, the IQ scores have a mean of 100 and deviation of 15. That being said, if we are considering the 50th percentile or above, then the kids selected for this test would have to have an IQ score of 100, being that 100 is the mean for the WISC-R.

8 0
3 years ago
Help im on a time limet
Ivanshal [37]
Idek it's just asking me to help but someone said a I don't even read this but good job
5 0
2 years ago
Llklkpjepfhaeippej[ofejf
crimeas [40]
This is a good point and i agree
6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Match the reference from the Gospel of John with the aspect of oneness or sameness of Jesus and the Father. (Match the number to
loris [4]

idk sorry download the holy  bible youversion app


6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
The problem with the motherhood penalty research discussed in my lecture, is that the authors only asked undergraduate students
Kazeer [188]

Answer:

The weak national government, or weak Congress, was brought to life following the Articles of Confederation. The government did not have the power to tax, regulate trade, or even make people obey to certain laws. People thought this was ideal as they were scared of being controlled by the government, just like what happened with Britain and the colonies. The Constitution fixed this, by bringing in a strong national government.

Explanation:

6 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • What does the traditional system value ?
    15·1 answer
  • The ________ of extreme right ideas combined with a scorched-earth personal level of politics in attacking opponents helped to b
    8·1 answer
  • Which social thinker won the Nobel Peace Prize in 1931?
    10·1 answer
  • Which form of punctuation is best suited for including an example within a sentence?
    5·1 answer
  • Whats the order of succession <br>1-4 for President​
    5·1 answer
  • What was the name of the trail followed by settlers moving west from Pennsylvania?
    7·2 answers
  • Ano ang natutunan mo sa pakikipagkapwa na nagamit mo ngayon bilang isang anak, estudyante at mamayan.​
    13·1 answer
  • What was the main goal of labor unions?
    11·2 answers
  • What are some tasks Stationary Engineers perform? Select four options.
    10·1 answer
  • Who was a colonial-era minister known for religious tolerance?
    13·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!