Answer:
According to the classical conditioning approach, in the above sighted case, the waitress is an example of a conditioned stimulus.
Explanation:
- Classical conditioning is a learning procedure through which a biologically potent stimulus, together with a neutral stimulus, where the neutral stimulus ignites a response.
- The response that occurs here is the same as the response that occurs in the case of stimulation by the potent stimulant. Thereby, the nurse is an alternative stimulus here.
- For instance, in the above example, if you see the food only, then, an individual shall start salivation, but since the waiter is associated with food in your mind, then when you see her, you shall be salivating, if you have appetite.
Answer:
None, this not an unethical behaviour
Explanation:
Andy's behaviour is unethical as it does not promote the principles of ethical leadership which are respect, service, community, honesty and justice neither does it promote altruism. He acted in a self-centered and egotistic manner.
Genital retraction syndrome (grs) is an unusual, culture-bound phenomenon that has attracted considerable attention in many areas of the world community, especially in Asia and Africa.
GRS or The koro syndrome is a psychiatric disorder characterized by acute anxiety and a deep-seated fear of shrinkage of the penis and its ultimate retraction into the abdomen, which will cause death.
Answer:
a. Slow down and allow him to pass
Explanation:
Since you are driving at the speed limit, you can not speed up to get out of his way. The other driver has more speed limit, and hence, he wants to pass you. If you slow down your speed he can pass and a possible accident could be avoided. Refusal to allow pass results, in most cases, a sense of jealous competition, which also could result in a fatal accident, or blowing to warn also could be irritating for another driver, who could take it as umbrage and will drive even faster in pursuit. A judicious decision is to slow down your car and allow him to pass.
Definitely false. The stamp act made things cost more, so you could buy less.
