Answer:
3.6 hours
Step-by-step explanation:
To solve, create a Rate, Time, Work chart:
Work is rate times time. For Kevin, his work is going to equal x over 6 job. For Anna, her expression for work will equal x over 9 job.
The work is 1 job of calling all clients, so their combined work is equal to 1.
x over 6 plus x over 9 equals 1
In the rational equation, x is the amount of time it takes Kevin and Anna to call the clients together. With rational equations, the terms can be added together once they have common denominators.
x over 6 plus x over 9 equals 1
fraction numerator begin display style x left parenthesis 9 right parenthesis end style over denominator begin display style 6 left parenthesis 9 right parenthesis end style end fraction plus fraction numerator begin display style x left parenthesis 6 right parenthesis end style over denominator begin display style 9 left parenthesis 6 right parenthesis end style end fraction equals fraction numerator begin display style 1 left parenthesis 6 right parenthesis left parenthesis 9 right parenthesis end style over denominator left parenthesis 6 right parenthesis left parenthesis 9 right parenthesis end fraction
fraction numerator 9 x over denominator 54 end fraction plus fraction numerator 6 x over denominator 54 end fraction equals 54 over 54
9 x plus 6 x equals 54
15 x equals 54
x equals 3.6
If Kevin and Anna work together, they can call all the clients in 3.6 hours.
Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
Equation : 165 = 102 + 1.4K
Define: K is # of kilometers
Solve: 63 = 1.4k, so k = 45
Final answer: 45 kilometers
Answer: D.) This is an example of inductive reasoning because a general conclusion is reached based on a specific example,
Step-by-step explanation: Inductive reasoning simply refers to making conclusion about a specific subject or topic from patterns or insights derived from related examples. In the scenario above, the conclusion reached encompasses the overall full time 4 years college student. However, this conclusion was inferred based on a specific example comprising of only a randomized sample of 1200 full time 4 years college students in 100 campuses. random. The example failed to incorporate every student, Hence, the conclusion is induced as the choice of a sample of students may not convey the choice or decision of all.
Deductive reasoning meanwhile follows that a generally established fact is used to make conclusion about a specific example.
