<span>A sudden influx of wealth from military action would throw off the balance of wealth in that, while other non-military people may have previously been wealthy, they would now no longer be wealthier than the soldiers who served them. With too much wealth, the value of money would also go down, causing the economy to actually decline. Also, with such an influx of wealth to the already wealthy, a larger rift would be created between the wealthy and the poor. That this wealth was accrued through military action would encourage more military action and more violence.</span>
Explanation:
option B is the correct answer buddy.
Answer:
Explanation:
Immigration were welcomed during late 1700s and early 1800s. Though, federalist fear immigrants can influence the culture and custom of US. This was the time, when United States wanted to keep the number of people in making of United States
Answer:
Under home rule, Indian citizens would remain part of the British empire but would govern themselves.
Explanation:
This is a matter of opinion.
If you think yes, you could argue that internment was a great PR move and/or that it protected the Japanese living in America from negative press
If you argue no (which I would) then you could argue that it was unconstitutional and/or had no strategic importance to the war itself.
