1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
antiseptic1488 [7]
3 years ago
7

13 POINTS PLEASE HELP

History
2 answers:
ryzh [129]3 years ago
5 0

Answer:

vote

Explanation:

9966 [12]3 years ago
4 0
It is The right to vote.
You might be interested in
What do OSHA and the SEC have in common?
Harlamova29_29 [7]

What is common between OSHA and SEC is : ( C ) Both create and enforce regulations

<h3>Functions of OSHA and SEC </h3>

OSHA sets/creates safety working standards which ensures safety working conditions for employees at work, this safety working standards are also enforced by OSHA through training and outreach to employers of labor. While SEC set rules which is aimed at protecting financial investors in an fairly regulated market ( stock market  and other forms of financial markets ). and also enforces them.

Hence we can conclude that What is common between OSHA and SEC is : ( C ) Both create and enforce regulations

Learn more about OSHA and SEC : brainly.com/question/11819769

#SPJ1

7 0
1 year ago
What group supported a strong central government
olga55 [171]
It was the Federalists who emerged in the 1790s.
5 0
3 years ago
Old war event that sparked exploration
Fiesta28 [93]

Answer:

The Haitian revolution lead and helped the discovery of the New World

Explanation:

7 0
3 years ago
Where did george washington mount a successful surprise attack on hessian troops on christmas eve, 1776?.
Romashka-Z-Leto [24]

At Trenton, New Jersey  George Washington mount a successful surprise attack on hessian troops on Christmas eve, 1776.

<h3><u>Who was George Washington?</u></h3>
  • American military soldier, statesman, and Founding Father George Washington presided over the country as its first leader from 1789 to 1797.
  • Washington, who was chosen as the Continental Army's commander by the Continental Congress, presided over the 1787 Constitutional Convention, which drafted the American federal constitution and led the Patriot forces to victory in the American Revolution.
  • Because of his numerous acts of leadership throughout the founding years of the nation, Washington has earned the moniker "Father of the Nation."

On Christmas Day 1776, Washington stormed the Hessian military post in Trenton, New Jersey (which belonged to mercenary German mercenaries who fought for the British), giving the Patriot Army new hope.

Know more about George Washington with the help of the given link:

brainly.com/question/4953122

#SPJ4

6 0
1 year ago
Why do priests need writing??? please help asap
lora16 [44]
Here is some information to help youWhy Do Priests Need Philosophy?
DECEMBER 27, 2014 BY FR. JAMES V. SCHALL, SJ

When he (Aquinas) was not sitting, reading a book, he walked round and round the cloister, and walked fast and even furiously, a very characteristic action of men who fight their battles in the mind. (G. K. Chesterton, St. Thomas Aquinas.) 1
Here we are touching on what is the most important difference … between Christianity on the one hand, and Islam as well as Judaism on the other. For Christianity, the sacred doctrine is revealed theology; for the Jew and the Muslim, the sacred doctrine is, at least primarily, the legal interpretation of the Divine Law. The sacred doctrine in the latter sense has to say the least, much less to do with philosophy than the sacred doctrine in the former sense. It is ultimately for this reason that the status of philosophy was, as a matter of principle, much more precarious in Judaism and in Islam than in Christianity: in Christianity, philosophy became an integral part of the officially recognized and even required training of the student of the sacred doctrine. (Leo Strauss, Persecution and the Art of Writing.) 2
Over the years, I have been invited to speak at a number of seminaries—to St. Charles in Philadelphia, to Notre Dame in New Orleans, to the seminary in Bridgeport, to St. Patrick’s in Menlo Park, and I once taught at the Gregorian University in Rome. Looking back on my own studies, I have often considered the three years we spent in philosophical studies at Mt. St. Michael’s in Spokane to be the most interesting and formative ones of my many years of clerical and academic studies. In recent years, I have heard a number of professors in Catholic colleges tell me, though this is by no means universal, that much more real faith and theology exist in the philosophy department than in the theology or religious studies departments of their school. An army chaplain also told me recently that a Catholic chaplain has an advantage over the protestant chaplain who relies on scripture alone to explain everything. Very often the problem is one of reason and good sense, one that is more amenable to reason than to faith, as such. It belongs to Catholicism to respect both reason and revelation as if they belonged together, which they do.
Here I want to talk about philosophical studies for the priesthood. I take as my models Msgr. John Whipple and Msgr. Robert Sokolowski, both diocesan priests in the school of philosophy at the Catholic University of America, both good priests and fine scholars. But first I would like to recall the lecture that I gave at the Bridgeport seminary several years ago. It was later published as an appendix to my book, The Life of the Mind. The lecture was called “Reading for Clerics.” In 2011, at the Theological College at the Catholic University of America, I gave a talk, entitled “Liberal Education and the Priesthood.” It was later published in the Homiletic & Pastoral Review.3
In both of these lectures, I wanted to point out something that I learned in a most graphic way from C. S. Lewis’ book, An Experiment in Criticism.4 The philosophic enterprise begins, I suppose, when we first take seriously the admonition of the Delphic Oracle. Socrates often quoted it, namely, that we should “know ourselves.” To “know ourselves” also means taking up Socrates’ other famous admonition, in the Apology, that “the unexamined life is not worth living.” But let us suppose that we, in fact, do know and examine ourselves, clearly no mean feat, as it is so easy to deceive ourselves about ourselves. Even with a good insight into ourselves, we still would not know much, even if we were Aquinas who seemed to know just about everything. We all remember that shortly before St. Thomas died, he stopped writing. He looked at all that he had written and realized that, compared to God, all he knew was “but straw,” as he quaintly put it.
We could go two ways with this incident from Aquinas. We could decide that it was not worth the effort if, after a lifetime of study, we knew very little even about our specialties, let alone about ourselves and others. Or, as is much the better way, we could be delighted in knowing what we did learn, however minimal it might be, compared to everything out there available to be known.
5 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • HELP PLZ WILL MARK AS BRAINLIEST!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! In two or three sentences, describe how open-market o
    6·2 answers
  • What did Coca Cola have instead of caffeine in 1900
    5·1 answer
  • Where were the earliest known settlements in india?
    9·1 answer
  • Name the members of the Confederated tribes of the colville reservation washington
    7·1 answer
  • Provoking someone into fighting you by yelling insults and slurs is protected by the Constitution.
    9·2 answers
  • How does a referendum give people more influence in government?
    15·1 answer
  • Answer the following questions:
    14·2 answers
  • Th
    6·1 answer
  • Please help this is so confusing for me what do I write???? I’ll VOR eu Brainly-
    7·2 answers
  • Did Ford make the right choice in pardoning Nixon? Why or why not?
    11·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!