1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Anna007 [38]
3 years ago
13

a group of students was told that their new teacher was humorous and easygoing. another group was told that he was rigid and har

d to work with. the fact that the first group reported he was easygoing and the second said that he was rigid is an example of
Advanced Placement (AP)
2 answers:
sergejj [24]3 years ago
4 0

Answer:

the fact that the first group reported he was easygoing and the second said that he was rigid is an example of <u>fundamental attribution error</u>.

Explanation:

Fundamental attribution can be described as the tendency of other people to judge a person based on their behaviour but ignore the situations that might have caused a person to behave in that particular way.

For example, in the scenario discussed in the question the second group of children judged the actions of their teacher as rigid but did not think that the teacher might be rigid due to some undergoing problems.

nydimaria [60]3 years ago
3 0

Answer:

Apex answer - Self-fulfilling prophecy. I got it wrong by listening to the guy above

Explanation:

You might be interested in
An example of good peer pressure would include
kari74 [83]

Answer:

Getting an after-school job and convincing friends to get a job too.

Explanation:

8 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Decomposers are neccesary in a food chain because they??
JulsSmile [24]
Decomposers are necessary to the food chain because they break down the results of the food chain into the basic elements that producers can then use to begin the process over again. Decomposers include groups of bacteria that help to speed up the decaying process of dead plants and animals.
Hope that helped! =)
5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
My brainly people who already did the staar test are we doing staar test 2019 ? Plz answer and say how do you know
Murljashka [212]
The questions aren’t the same for everyone, it always changes so to be safe don’t just study 2019 questions, but the star test should be easy
4 0
3 years ago
A psychology graduate student conducted a study at the entrance to a football game at the university. The entrance was specifica
tankabanditka [31]

Answer:

ndent variable.

Explain how the data support or do not support each of the hypotheses.

Explain why the findings cannot be generalized to all students

4 0
3 years ago
Describe the trend in judicial independence in the United Kingdom between 1990 and 2019. Explain a possible reason for this tren
WINSTONCH [101]

Answer:

The main factors aimed at securing judicial independence

 

The previous section has briefly explained why judicial independence is important for maintaining judges' impartiality and the rule of law. This section now focuses on how judicial independence can be guaranteed in its fundamental aspects (external, internal, institutional and individual independence). Various mechanisms are possible, and a range of examples are provided to encourage debate and develop critical thinking.

Judicial independence is a multifaceted concept. There are different institutional, legal and operational arrangements that in abstracto are designed to ensure judicial independence, and they can work differently depending on the historical, political, legal and social context in which the judiciary operates. Therefore, there is not an ideal model of implementing judicial independence in the sense that one-size-fits-all. Judicial independence is - in more concrete terms - the result of a combination of different conditions, measures, checks and balances, that can vary from one country to another. Every country has to find its own balance.

In some countries, for example, judicial independence is basically secured through a self-governing body or council (composed mainly of judges) which is in charge of all the decisions concerning judges' recruitment/nomination, career, transfer and discipline. This occurs, for example, in France, Italy, Mongolia, Nigeria, Poland, Romania, Spain, and Ukraine. In other countries, such as Kenya, South Africa, India, Germany, Austria, Czech Republic, India, Kenya, South Africa, the United States, there is no equivalent body, and judicial independence is thereby secured through various other mechanisms. Therefore, what is deemed to be an essential measure in some countries may be not considered as such in others. This reveals rather different views on the institutional means needed to protect judicial independence.

The process of defining the institutional requirements of judicial independence has by no means come to an end. For example, the oldest institution of the British constitutional system, the office of Lord Chancellor, has been recently redesigned in an effort to bring about a clearer separation between the branches of the State, and to enhance the independence of the judiciary (see the UK Constitutional Reform Act, 2005; Shetreet and Turenne, 2013).

The protection of judicial independence is usually considered as including various aspects that operate on different levels: external and internal independence, and institutional and individual independence. External independence refers to the independence of the judiciary from the political branches (Executive and Legislative power), as well as any other nonjudicial actor. Although there must, of necessity, be some relations between the judiciary and the political powers (especially the Executive), as stated in the Commentary on the Bangalore Principles "such relations must not interfere with the judiciary's liberty in adjudicating individual disputes and in upholding the law and values of the Constitution" (2007, para. 26). Internal independence focuses on guarantees aimed at protecting individual judges from undue pressure from within the judiciary: from other judges and, above all, from high ranking judges. High ranking judges may, for example, exert supervising power over courts' administration (depending on the organization of the judicial system), but they must not - in any way - influence the substance of judges' decision-making.

Institutional independence pertains to the institutional and legal arrangements designed ex ante by the State to shield judges from undue pressure and influence. From this point of view, the most important factors concern the way in which judges are recruited, evaluated, and disciplined, the governance of the judiciary and courts' administration.

5 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • What do you think the driving force behind the resource depletion really is ?
    8·1 answer
  • A lottery sells 1000 tickets at $1 apiece. There is one winner who receives $100, and 5 second place winners who receive $50 eac
    12·2 answers
  • By all predictions, the developing world's population will grow much faster over the next several decades than the developed wor
    10·1 answer
  • Clearing out the clutter and gaining freedom to focus on important tasks is a benefit of
    11·1 answer
  • Why is a less diverse ecosystem more vulnerable??
    10·1 answer
  • Bằng lý luận và thực tiễn, anh (chị) hãy phân tích các đặc trưng của nhà nước Việt Nam để thấy rõ tính ưu việt của nhà nước Việt
    6·1 answer
  • Which can be used to control the salinity of soil?
    12·1 answer
  • -Explain how genes and heredity can partially explain behavior and physical attributes
    15·1 answer
  • Read this excerpt from a speech by televangelist Jerry Falwell, 1980.
    15·1 answer
  • What do you mean by bequeath?
    11·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!