Auschwitz II-Birkenau and Auschwitz III-Monowitz were two different concentration camps that had different purposes and objectives.
Auschwitz II-Birkenau was the most infamous of all three Auschwitz camps. It was the one that was specifically made for killing, for performing genocide over the people that the German officials didn't thought deserve to live. This was the camp where the Jews were killed, accompanied by the Gypsies, and later by Slavic people, mostly people from the Soviet Union and Poland.
Auschwitz III-Monowitz was a camp with different purpose. The prisoners in this camp were not systematically killed, bu instead they were used as a labor force. The prisoners in this camp were overworked, they suffered from malnutrition, and had terrible conditions for living. Lot of them died because of those things, not because of direct murder. This prisoners were used as labor force for the rubber factory.
That was sooo creativvveeee let me hit
Answer:
Texas shared the position of other slave states regarding the future of new territories and new states. It wanted the expansion of slavery. Southern states advocated a popular sovereignty solution, that is, new states to be admitted to the Union should choose by themselves. The 1854 Kansas-Nebraska Act was a political compromise. Nevertheless, Texas had important objections. In a speech in the Senate delivered on February 15, 1854, Texan leader Sam Houston lists two important obstacles: Nebraska had a too small population in order to sustain organization , and Kansas was a land with very few white settlers and entirely occupied by Native tribes.
Explanation:
The repeal of Prohibition likely had a lot to do with the Great Depression. Following the Crash of 1929, people were discouraged and their spirits were low. Allowing the sale and consumption of alcohol not only gave people an escape from their problems, it provided a much-needed boost to the economy, as alcohol was an enormous industry before, after and even during Prohibition.
<span>George Washington's foreign policy was primarily to keep the United States neutral in foreign affairs as much as possible, as he did not believe it wise for the new nation to involve itself in the affairs of other nations. In this regard, he was not only successful, but set a precedent for U.S. foreign policy for many years to come.
please give me brainliest</span>
