Answer:
There is enough evidence to say that the true average heat output of persons with the syndrmoe differs from the true average heat output of non-sufferers.
Step-by-step explanation:
We have to perform a hypothesis test on the difference between means.
The null and alternative hypothesis are:

μ1: mean heat output for subjects with the syndrome.
μ2: mean heat output for non-sufferers.
We will use a significance level of 0.05.
The difference between sample means is:

The standard error is

The t-statistic is

The degrees of freedom are

The critical value for a left tailed test at a significance level of 0.05 and 16 degrees of freedom is t=-1.746.
The t-statistic is below the critical value, so it lies in the rejection region.
The null hypothesis is rejected.
There is enough evidence to say that the true average heat output of persons with the syndrmoe differs from the true average heat output of non-sufferers.
The answer should be A
please let me know if this is wrong
Answer:
The answer to the equation is W’(4, –2), X’(3, –4), Y’(1, –4), Z’(0, –2)
Step-by-step explanation:
Because its turning 180 degrees that means its turning half the way it is. and if you look on the graph the z is Z (0, 2). which if you flip it upside down it would be (0,-2)
Also i took the test! :)
angle 2 and angle 6 are corresponding angles.
Since the lines crossed by the trnasversal are parallel, corresponding angles are congruent. (equal)
angle 6 = 106°