The correct answer is vicarious conditioning.
Vicarious conditioning refers to the phenomenon wherein individuals learn responses, attitudes and beliefs about something or someone (a stimulus), not through direct experience with a stimulus, but, rather through observing someone else's reaction to a stimulus. In this instance, Jackson "learned" to fear diving boards and deep swimming pools through observing his sister's traumatic experience with them.
To uphold it as a symbol of unity
To preserve it as a symbol of nationhood
To protect its effect as a symbol
The southern democrats chose Kentucky politician, John Breckinridge. He served as Vice President under President Buchanan and when the Civil war broke out enlisted in the Confederate Army, he then was appointed as Confederate Secretary of War. He was seen as one of the most pronoun traitors of the war, he as Presient Davis (CSA) had very different views on terms of surrender. Breckinridge wasnt going to risk loosing tens of thousands of more men whereas davis sought to continue the fight Breckenridge became dissillusioned and knew the south couldnt sustain a prolonged conflict. He was one of the first Southern politicians to begin drafting terms of surrender.
<span>Contrary to uninformed opinion, defendants who are found
not guilty by the reason of insanity are not merely released from the custody.
They are usually committed into mental hospitals where they are confined for duration
longer than their prison terms would have been. For example in the case
of Jones v. United States, the Supreme Court in 1983 backed this
proposition, ruling that the sentence that criminal defendants should have received
had they been convicted shall have no bearing on how long they could be
committed to a mental hospital.</span>
<span>Therefore the correct answer to fill in the blank is “may
be longer”.</span>
Answer: 1) Supreme court always opposes anything that is against constitutio
2) They give judgment without favouritism
Explanation:
The Supreme Court has taken these particular stands in the court by rejecting the argument that presidents or executive officials could waive statutory policy, in this case the Neutrality Act of 1794. A president may not authorize a person to do what the law forbids
The overall opinion the Supreme Court believe about Presidential Power are:
the Supreme Court interpreted constitutional disputes between the two elected branches without favoring presidential power over Congress.
It also recognized that, when a presidential proclamation in time of war conflicts with congressional language expressed in a statute, the legislative position prevails
