For the answer to the questions above, I think the most significant thing is probably manpower. The Romans had the pool of hundreds of thousands of small farmers to draw upon. The Carthaginians used mainly mercenaries and federate.<span>The Roman Govt also seems to have taken the war more seriously, as a 'total war', and mobilized all their resources earlier and more effectively. Combined with their larger manpower this meant they were able to absorb defeats more easily and continue fighting. I have read a book which used the analogy of a disciplined roman 'communist' society fighting a disinterested Carthaginian 'capitalist' society. Romans have a strong government system which is so organized and amazing how they developed that advance system that time
</span>I hope my answer helped you.
European navigators once sought to find the northwest passage (a sea route), in hope to reach India and China.<span>
</span>
<span>People with high level self esteem believe in themselves and push themselves to succeed while those with low confidence feel a sense of entitlement. </span>
It was positive because slaves could pick the cotton much faster that way, and it increased the availability of cotton for sale and for things like clothes because the cotton gin got it done so much faster
Answer:
It will be admissible as the testimony will be used to impeach the witness for being biased against the restaurant.
Explanation:
The US legal system allows for witness impeachment where bias can be the cause for concern. As this cross examination of the waiter by the defense laid the foundation to accuse him of bias, the court would allow this new testimony as evidence of bias.
