1
a= 6/12 or one half.
b= 1/2 , one half.
step by step:
multiply the top numbers by eachothers
do the same with the bottom.
Answer:
√
8
≈
3
Explanation:
Note that:
2
2
=
4
<
8
<
9
=
3
2
Hence the (positive) square root of
8
is somewhere between
2
and
3
. Since
8
is much closer to
9
=
3
2
than
4
=
2
2
, we can deduce that the closest integer to the square root is
3
.
We can use this proximity of the square root of
8
to
3
to derive an efficient method for finding approximations.
Consider a quadratic with zeros
3
+
√
8
and
3
−
√
8
:
(
x
−
3
−
√
8
)
(
x
−
3
+
√
8
)
=
(
x
−
3
)
2
−
8
=
x
2
−
6
x
+
1
From this quadratic, we can define a sequence of integers recursively as follows:
⎧
⎪
⎨
⎪
⎩
a
0
=
0
a
1
=
1
a
n
+
2
=
6
a
n
+
1
−
a
n
The first few terms are:
0
,
1
,
6
,
35
,
204
,
1189
,
6930
,
...
The ratio between successive terms will tend very quickly towards
3
+
√
8
.
So:
√
8
≈
6930
1189
−
3
=
3363
1189
≈
2.828427
The answer is to 27/45 is 3/5
If we let the number of flip-flops be x in the equation and that the cost would be y ( in terms of x) and the income would be z ( in terms of x), these equations will likely intersect each other during breakeven. That is, when the total revenue that the company will gain from sales of the flip-flops just be equal with the total cost.
