1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
lubasha [3.4K]
3 years ago
7

How were spartan and athenian governments different?

History
2 answers:
zloy xaker [14]3 years ago
7 0

Answer:c

Explanation:

solniwko [45]3 years ago
6 0
Sparta and Athens had very different governments. Sparta was a militaristic state. This means that all decisions made by the government revolved around the wants and needs of the military. This resulted in Sparta developing one of the strongest armies in the world during this era.

Athens on the other hand had a form of democracy. A democracy is when individual citizens have a say in what laws are made and what representatives there are in the government. This gave the average Athenian much more political power in comparison to Sparta.
You might be interested in
Phil works in a ____ job and earns minimum wage. <br> Low-paying<br> High-paying
pshichka [43]
Low paying job because he is only earning min. wage.

6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Which three major rivers flow through the land claimed france?
Sedaia [141]
The rivers are the seine, rhone, and loire
5 0
2 years ago
Tyler, Dusty, and Matt own all shares of stock in Abels​ Enterprises, and shares of stock are not offered to the general public.
kobusy [5.1K]

Abels Enterprises is likely a closely held corporation because shares of stock are not offered to the general public.

Since Abels Enterprises is a closely held corporation, it has a limited number of stockholders and its stocks are rarely exchanged.

5 0
2 years ago
What arguments did the US government use to justify building railroads despite the damage to native cultures? How did such damag
andrew-mc [135]

Explanation:

I believe they used the phrase "Manifest Destiny." In other words, they believed that it was their destiny to have the land and to build upon it.

The damage outweighed the benefits to the American people because it meant they got to "have more." In other words, more money.

The government could have made an agreement with the natives and possibly allowed them to continue living on the land, perhaps, that would have caused less wars or battles in the end.

6 0
3 years ago
What action did Stalin take that heightened the tension between the United States and USSR? Why did these actions concern the Un
arlik [135]

Answer:

cause of tension was that the Soviet Union was trying to spread communism. The U.S. was against communism and they took leadership of containment policy. The Containment policy was the U.S. approach to trying to prevent communism spreading.

Explanation:

4 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • How did the railroad companies benefit
    7·1 answer
  • How has the bill of rights been important in american history since 1791?
    6·1 answer
  • 12. What events caused the United States to declare war?
    11·2 answers
  • Which of the following do tomatoes and love not have in common? a. association with the color red c. Japanese culture b. growth
    14·2 answers
  • How did U.S. foreign policy in Vietnam during the Cold War conflict with traditional
    6·2 answers
  • Do you think tecumseh’s grievances against white men are accurate of nineteenth century euro Americans attitudes about Indian pe
    6·1 answer
  • How did feudalism help the environment
    15·1 answer
  • What action does a patriot support?
    11·2 answers
  • Question 7 of 10
    11·2 answers
  • Who is the princess of Pop 1999?<br>Need It​
    11·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!