Answer:
The correct answer is letter "C": SWOT analysis.
Explanation:
The SWOT (<em>Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities, and Threats</em>) analysis is a study that aims to identify the internal and external components that can drive a company to success or failure. Internal components are represented by the strengths and weaknesses of the firm while the external factors are represented by opportunities and threats.
Identifying such company factors allows entities of taking action on time and taking advantage of the chances the market can provide. Usually, these factors are recognized during the project planning stage of the enterprise.
Answer:
Options B and C are correct.
- Marginal profit is negative.
- Profit is positive.
Explanation:
At q = 150
R = 80q = 80(150) = 12,000
C = 0.002(150)3 + 22(150) + 750 = 6750 + 3300 + 750 = 10,800
R > C so first is incorrect.
MR = 80
MC = 0.006(150 x 150) + 22 = 135 + 22 = 157
MC > MR so B is correct.
Profit = TR - TC = 80(150) - 0.002(150)3 - 22(150) - 750 = 12000 - 10800 = 1200
Profit is positive.
Marginal profit = MR - MC = 80 - 157 = - 77
MR is Negative
" There is an unequal distribution of power in the company " best explains this situation
Explanation:
Inequity is the almost inevitable result of two strong forces:
human bias and socioeconomic injustice.
One may debate whether or not power imbalances and other social inequalities induce bias.
(Even though the notion of a single variable approach to these debates encourages most of us, the truth is more complex; each one strengthens the other and this always results in a chicken and egg debate.)
Unfairness and discrimination can also be found interchangeably with everyday terminology.
I presumption a difference here: the definition of the word 'inequality' and the control of the expression 'inequity.' Inequality contributes to the allocation of such products, some of which earn more than others. Inequity stretches into this: not just unequal allocation; disproportionate and unjust allocation.
Answer:
C
Explanation:
and I remember I had that question but I don't remember how to explain it sorry hope it's helps
Answer:
Katherine was lying and/or hiding something
Explanation:
Alisa most likely decoded Katherine's explanation in such a way that she believed Katherine was lying and/or hiding something. This is because based on psychological studies, individuals tend to state that they are "telling the truth" and yet still provide no actual proof when they are lying. In this scenario, Katherine simply states that she is "telling the truth" but has not shown Alisa any financial reports or other valuable data that proves that there was not enough funding, which would be easy to provide if they actually existed.