Answer:
<h2> Assuming your friend said the temperature over there was 68 degrees Fahrenheit in degrees C it would be 20 °C</h2>
Step-by-step explanation:
The question is not complete, as the information, your best friend in Europe about the temperature over there is missing, nevertheless, we can proceed with this problem by plugging in an assumed temperature.
The expression for conversion from degrees F to degrees C is given as
T(°C) = (T(°F) - 32) × 5/9
Now say temperature your friend e-mailed you is 68 degrees Fahrenheit (you can as well plug in your own value)
T(°C) = (68°F - 32) × 5/9
T(°C) = (36) × 5/9
T(°C) = 180/9 = 20 °C
T(°C) = 20 °C
The ratio 21:14 when divided by 7 on each side, is the smallest ratio that has the same value as 21:14. this becomes 3:2
then multiply both sides by a few different numbers on both sides each ,
for example, 3:2 is the same as
6:4 (3:2 times 2)
9:6 (3:2 times 3)
12:8 (3:2 times 4)
15:10 (3:2 times 5) and so on
the ratio of the right number I
divided by the left on all of them is 1.5
so,
14/10 equals 1.4 (nope)
8/4 equals 2 (nope)
9/6 equals 1.5 (yay)
12/21 equals 0.57 (Lol)
So your answer is 9:6
Answer:
(c) H0 should be rejected
Step-by-step explanation:
Null hypothesis (H0): population mean is equal to 5
Alternate hypothesis (Ha): population mean is greater than 5
Z = (sample mean - population mean) ÷ (sd/√n)
sample mean = 5.3, population mean = 5, sd = 1, n = 500
Z = (5.3 - 5) ÷ (1/√500) = 0.3 ÷ 0.045 = 6.67
Using the normal distribution table, for a one tailed test at 0.01 significance level, the critical value is 2.326
Conclusion:
Since 6.67 is greater than 2.326, reject the null hypothesis (H0)
I could be wrong but I think it’s 144,000m for the area
Urmomdadsisbrouncleauntmybutt
