<u> </u>
<u>Step-by-step explanation:</u>
In the question given correct parameter is - 2)
Method -
........................(1)
..........................(2)
Let's solve the equation 1,
⇒ 
⇒ 
- Put the value of t² in equation 2
<u>Here we got the y parameter as </u>
<u>So the option no .2 is the correct option</u> 2) <u> </u>
Since Jackie has 1/3 and Steven has 4/12 we add them together
4/12+1/3= 2/3
Together they have 2/3 of a Hershey Bar
Let f(x) = p(x)/q(x), where p and q are polynomials and reduced to lowest terms. (If p and q have a common factor, then they contribute removable discontinuities ('holes').)
Write this in cases:
(i) If deg p(x) ≤ deg q(x), then f(x) is a proper rational function, and lim(x→ ±∞) f(x) = constant.
If deg p(x) < deg q(x), then these limits equal 0, thus yielding the horizontal asymptote y = 0.
If deg p(x) = deg q(x), then these limits equal a/b, where a and b are the leading coefficients of p(x) and q(x), respectively. Hence, we have the horizontal asymptote y = a/b.
Note that there are no obliques asymptotes in this case. ------------- (ii) If deg p(x) > deg q(x), then f(x) is an improper rational function.
By long division, we can write f(x) = g(x) + r(x)/q(x), where g(x) and r(x) are polynomials and deg r(x) < deg q(x).
As in (i), note that lim(x→ ±∞) [f(x) - g(x)] = lim(x→ ±∞) r(x)/q(x) = 0. Hence, y = g(x) is an asymptote. (In particular, if deg g(x) = 1, then this is an oblique asymptote.)
This time, note that there are no horizontal asymptotes. ------------------ In summary, the degrees of p(x) and q(x) control which kind of asymptote we have.
I hope this helps!
0.12 I think I’m not sure how to do this I ji at have an idea maybe I’m super wrong
Answer:
<h2>You will ride for 4 hrs 8min</h2>
Step-by-step explanation:
What we are expected to solve for that the problem did not expressly state is most likely the number of hours that you could ride for an amount of $65.
firstly we need to model the inequality (equation) for this scenario.
the constant fee= $3 additional fee for helmet
We can now solve for n since the above inequality satisfies the condition presented in the problem statement.
Divide both sides by 15 to find n
