A good argument must have at least true premises, must be valid and or strong, and have premises that are more plausible than its conclusion. If a valid argument has a false conclusion, then one of its premises must be false.
Neither would fit perfectly.
Grammatically Unconventional
We know, we know – the last time you wrote a "grammatically unconventional" English paper you got a C-. Stephen Crane certainly takes liberty with the conventions of the language, going Yoda on us with sentences like these:
"Doubts and he were struggling" (11.15).
"A sputtering of musketry was always to be heard" (16.1).
"It is true that his trousers felt to him that they were no fit for his legs at all" (3.27).
"A house standing placidly in distant fields had to him an ominous look" (3.28).
Weird, right? This takes some getting used to, but it certainly marks the novel with a stylistic individuality.
Send to me inbox i now the answer
Answer:
where is the passage??
there isn't even a passage