For most Latin American countries, the 1800s were the Era of __________.

History

1 answer:

igor_vitrenko [27]3 years ago

4 0

The correct answer is A. For most Latin American countries, the 1800s were the Era of Independence.

In response to the enthronement of King Joseph Bonaparte in Spain, between 1808 and 1810 government boards were installed that exercised sovereignty on behalf of the abdicated King Ferdinand VII, both in the Iberian Peninsula and in the Latin American territories. The resistance of the Latin American juntas to submit to the Central Supreme Junta formed in Spain, radicalized positions and led to the armed struggle between realists and patriots. From 1810, various Latin American territories began to declare themselves independent national states under republican regimes, forming large "liberating" armies of continental scope, among which were those commanded by the Argentine Jose de San Martin and the Venezuelan Simon Bolivar. The independence of the new states was consolidated in the 1820s, after the victory at the Battle of Ayacucho. After losing El Callao in January 1826, the only territories dominated by Spaniards in America were Cuba and Puerto Rico.

You might be interested in

What name wa given to the ma movement of African-American from the Southern to the northern citie

Debora [2.8K]

Another of the biggest population shifts in American history was the Great Migration. Between the 1910s and the 1970s, around 6 millions Black American fled from the American South to Northern, Midwestern or west.

One of the biggest ethnic groupings in the US is made up of Black people. Although most Black American are of African descent, many also have non-African forebears. Most African Americans are descended from enslaved individuals who were forcibly transported from their native Africa to work in the Age Of exploration. Their legal options were severely constrained, and they had long been denied the chance to participate in the economic, social, and social changes of the US. But Black American have contributed fundamentally and enduringly to American history and culture.

Learn more about Black American here:

brainly.com/question/29343935

#SPJ4

7 0

11 months ago

Under the communist party, organized religion in the Soviet Union was officially

swat32

Question: Under the communist party, organized religion in the Soviet Union was officially:

Options:

1) Tolerated
2) Encouraged
3) Subsidized
4) Banned

Answer: The correct answer is: 4) Banned.

Explanation: The Soviet Union was the first state to have as an objective the abolisment of religion. The Communist regime ridiculed religion, harassed believers, confiscated church property, and propagated atheism in the schools. The Soviets had originally believed that if churches were deprived of its power, religion would be quickly eliminated. When this did not happen, they took more drastic measures. In Stalin’s purges (1936-1937) tens of thousands of clergy were grouped and shot. In some areas, it even became illegal for parents to teach religion to their own children. From 1917 to the 1980s, the more religion sustained, the more the Soviets would do to eliminate it.

7 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

What news do voltimand and cornelius bring back from norway?

Evgesh-ka [11]

Fortinbras will not attack Denmark.
Good news. The King of Norway has diverted his nephew Fortinbras to an attack on Poland instead of Norway (for now). There is word-play that makes this parallel Hamlet's killing of Polonius instead of Claudius.

8 0

3 years ago

What do you call a person who maintains that God created the universe and its natural laws, but God does not interfere with thos

Jet001 [13]

You call them a Deists. Deism combines a rejection of religious knowledge as a source of authority with the conclusion that reason and observation of the natural world are sufficient to determine the existance of a single creator of the universe.

8 0

3 years ago

How were the goals of Marcus Garvey and stokely Carmichael different

Alex777 [14]

Answer:

Stokely Carmichael's goal:

Black power also represented Carmichael's break with King's doctrine of nonviolence and its end goal of racial integration. Instead, he associated the term with the doctrine of black separatism, articulated most prominently by Malcolm X.

Marcus Garvey's goal:

Garvey's original goal was racial uplift and establishment of education and industrial opportunities for black people. Another goal of Garvey's was to unify all of the Negro people of the world into one great body and establish a country and government of their own.

The DIFFERENCE* is that Stokely was to seperate blacks and whites, while Marcus was to help create jobs for black people, and to help brind them together, a similarity is they we're both about black and white being seperate.

Explanation:

Hope this helped :)

6 0

3 years ago