Miranda v. Arizona is the U.S. Supreme Court case that condemned using psychological coercion, engaging in trickery or deceit, holding a suspect incommunicado, or making promises that can't be kept.
The Miranda v. Arizona Supreme Court ruling (1966) ruled that arrested persons have rights to self-discrimination and lawyers under the fifth and sixth amendments to the United States Constitution.
The Supreme Court ruled that detained criminal suspects must be informed of their constitutional rights against defense counsel and self-incrimination before cross-examinating police.
the majority opinion by Earl Warren. Article 5 of the Constitutional Amendment requires law enforcement authorities to advise suspects on their right to remain silent during police detention interrogations and to consult lawyers.
Learn more about Miranda v. Arizona here: brainly.com/question/1307890
#SPJ4
Answer:
physical system don't determine human interaction, however, it does influence and constrain choices they make. hope that helps
Examples are used to "exemplify" a situation. Hence, we take an abstract theory and we make it more approachable by showcasing some details. Hence, we have that the example makes abstract idea more concrete. The first 2 choices are wrong since they state the opposite. The 3rd choice is rather irrelevant, examples can make it more or less didactic. Hence, the 4th choice is correct.
Answer:
clients
Explanation:
Dr. Moser, a clinical psychologist, believes that abnormality is the result of problems in living. Dr. Moser would most likely refer to those who seek her help as clients.
A client is an individual who consults the services of a professional in a field. Those who consult Dr. Moser are his clients.
